The reason that I am writing this is that throughout the ages, all of the items that I have discovered have been highly sought as cultural information. Every single piece of information in the body of this material is considered the HOLY GRAIL of HISTORY! Each of these discoveries has been hidden from the minds of humanity since long before the birth of Christ. If you are going to do a literary work or movie about anything, it should be as accurate as possible, and if one does not know of the existence of certain pieces of information then any documentary or feature film will be inaccurate. I will do a movie about these discoveries. Please note: Hyksos-Kassites in the body of the work below. Until now no one has been able to correctly identify the Hyksos invaders of Egypt... nobody. Except myself, really... The Hyksos-Kassites were originally Buddhist-Ammorites from the Himalayan Mountain regions related to Tibet and Northern India long after Ptah-Buddha-Moses died. If this is true, then it is true empirically, that is aside from any authority or intellectual body. However, if any material or body of research is not recognized or at least investigated by an independent or collective body of individuals... what's the point. If no one knows where to look, then one may not begin to find it. Anyone, from any walk of life, can discover anything at all, all they have to do is look! I know that you will find this material very interesting.

Signed,

Brian McMillan

Megalithic Architecture and Egyptian Building Techniques +

Egyptian Tomb Records of Buddhism and the Land of Punt +

King David and Solomon's Mines + Hyksos-Kassites The

Himalayan Connection + UPUAT Project Commentary +

Guge, Gujjaratta and the Mesopotamian Mythical Land of

Aratta + Jaipur-Jipar + The Appearance of Zero

by Brian S. McMillan

PYRAMIDS, PYLONS, OBELISK, AND MORE

The tomb wall of King Thutmosis III brings us a wealth of visual information. The Imi-duat texts represented on the the interior of the burial chamber appear to show many historical facts secret to the ruling class and the priests. Three such images that I have noticed; two of which appear to show the same event in close proximity on the wall, seem to represent the 'Eye's of Buddha' found on the stupas of the Kathmandu Valley with the all seeing eye of Ra or 'Third Eye' center as well as a 'Stupa', or the Lords Chariot with the umbrella-antenna in a style almost exclusive to the Chaitya halls at Bhaja, Karle and Ajanta in the northern region of India. These come from the Shunga and early Andhra periods respectively and appear to mirror the style of the Great Stupa at Sanchi India. If this is true then it would indicate that Buddhism and in turn these particular archaeological sites are much older than previously suspected.

The third image of particular interest illustrated on the wall of the Thutmosis III burial tomb, shows stone blocks being floated on barges up what appear to be canals separated by lochs. This must be how the Ancient Egyptians used the hydraulic pump of the Great Pyramids to move water up out of the bedrock of the Giza Plateau to be channeled down through these lochs and finally moving the barges up the loch steps of the pyramids themselves in order to move the monoliths to their final positions. While I found this last image in a much older book published in 1971 titled, "Secrets Of The Great Pyramid" by Peter Tompkins on page 258 (also note the top picture p. 258, showing the hydraulic technique), without the tomb of origin, a more recent and descriptive printing of the image may be seen on page 235 fig.139, in a book titled "Egyptian Art" by Malek, Jaromir / 1999. Note: James Churchward stated that the unadorned serpent has always been the symbol for water... (He was right). Furthermore, in 1994 while excavating a site for a hotel in Cairo Egypt, just such canal-lochs were discovered leading from the Nile in the direction of the Great Pyramids on the Giza Plateau. (see URL click-on's below) The use of water as a buoyant vehicle was deliberately pumped up through the connecting well from the drain in the subterranean pit; the lowest chamber far below the center of the pyramid, by the use of plunging stones down the ascending and descending passages of which were lined with hard granite for constant and repeated use. In the case of the Khufu-Cheops Pyramid, the Grand Gallery was obviously a modified invention of the hydraulic process which was to facilitate a long standing technique utilized throughout all historic periods where pyramids were constructed in Egypt. I say this because most if not all of the pyramids in Egypt were accompanied by the construction of a descending passage and connecting well. The use of the Portcullis of the "Triple Veil" located at the position of the Kings Antechamber was to act as a type of block and tackle in the pulling of ropes attached to the rigging within the Grand Gallery and gain leverage to pull the plunging stone or "Enclosed Vessel" against the slope of gravity and up the ascending passage and possibly to push the heavy wheel tied to the connecting arm of that chamber against the hydraulic pressure needed to force water up the connecting well. This is why the notches in the walls of the portcullis are heavily worn even though they are of hard granite, because of the repeated movement of the heavy stone blocks acting as a counterbalance.

The early use of the Egyptian obelisk as a counter balance beam was not only employed to place the facing stones on the pyramid but was also utilized throughout later periods in the construction of pylon retaining walls acting as water reservoirs, where smaller chambers could be filled with water from the pylon reservoirs and thereby lifting the monolithic stone blocks up on to their supports. These pylon reservoirs were constructed first in front of the proposed monument by using the obelisk. This is why these monuments all have obelisk positions in front of the pylon entry walls and also would explain why the pylons themselves appear to be so proportionately tall and slim walled in comparison with the rest of the temple proper. The temples at Luxor and Karnak as well as the temple of Horus at Edfu are but three of the many proposed examples of the application of this hydraulic technique. Coincidentally, a similar employment of this technique through the use of reservoir retaining walls was used by the Ancient Cambodians in Judah to build the Solomon Temple-Angkor Wat, as well as the other megalithic stone architecture of the region. This is why all of the monuments of Angkor have a moat or canal running in close proximity to the construction sites. This would be a consistent and reasonable proposal, since the peoples inhabiting Ancient Cambodia are really the descendants of the Tribe of Judah which came up out of Egypt with Aaron and Buddha-Moses. A similar use of hydraulics may have also been employed in the construction of Sachsaywaman in Peru.

UPUAUT PROJECT (Commentary)

I have added this portion of the narrative to address the concerns of the "UPUAUT PROJECT". The shaft problem may be addressed by considering that, in order to pump water to the upper levels, the first concern of the builders would be to construct conduits to deliver the water to those upper levels. The long horizontal entrance to the so called "Queen's Chamber" was probably used to 'pump' water from the 'connecting well' level by filling the "Queen's Chamber" up to the ceiling and placing a hollow sarcophagus-plunging stone at the entrance to the hallway and then draining the remaining water from the path of the workers down either the connecting well or the descending passage and thereby allowing the workers to push the plunging stone by sliding it along the hallway to force water up the shafts to those upper levels. The use of 'mortar' would have been to insure a water-tight seal within those shafts as construction continued to successively higher levels. The fact that the UPUAUT team found that the joints within these shafts contained openings where water could leak out is not at all surprising, given the fact that after thousands of years of settling, the very large stones along with their mortar would have deteriorated in composition as well as position. Because of the nature of the connecting well along with the passages leading from so far below the ground level, it would be out of the question not to consider the hydraulic hypothesis beyond supposition. It would be even more ridiculous to assume that the Ancient Egyptians did not utilize some form of hydraulic mechanical assistance in their construction methods, especially since the tomb wall of Thutmosis III clearly illustrates the use of block mounted barges floating on canal's as their primary mode of transportation. It should also be noted that any new evidence found within the structures of the Great Pyramids, or any Egyptian Pyramid for that matter should only serve to further promote this hypothesis. The fact that "secret chambers" or doors could be found is further evidence to support the existence of 'lochs' or reservoirs at the subsequent building levels. The sealing of these shafts from the interior of the so called "Queen's Chamber" to isolate them after their use, in order to promote the integrity of the shafts leading from the so called 'King's Chamber" is no more surprising than the changing of the direction of these shafts during the course of the construction of the levels of the pyramids in order to ensure the maximum termination height for the delivery of water.

KAMBUJUDESHA-JUDAH

There is also common reference to Angkor as being the heart of the Khmer Empire; when in reality the word Khmer was taken from the longest standing and most durable stone structures in Kambu-Judesa... the temples. Where these temples were maintained by the priest class mentioned in Zep 1: 4 of the Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures as the "Chemarims". Oddly enough, ancient historical reference to to the 'Cimmerian Hoards' may refer to the Siam-Simeonites or even the priestly class of warriors in the same way that KURU is synonymous with GURU in India and Tibet. From the Douay-Rheims Bible, quoting: "And the wisdom of Solomon surpassed the wisdom of all the Orientals, and of the Egyptians,". In addition to Angkor Wat being the House that Solomon built. King Solomon's Mines should more correctly be called King David's Mines. Since King David's real title is spelled King Udayadityavarman, and there is a statue on the Island of Sumatra to commemorate him. The City of Palembang is near the ancient gold mines of Ophir as listed in the Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures. These gold mines were originally controlled by the Srivijaya Empire and taken over by King David-Udayadityavarman, where the gold was taken from Jambi down river, and across an ancient canal-joined with the Musi River or to the mouth just below Malayasia and back up the Musi River to Palembang to await shipment to the mouth of the Mekong Delta and then up to Angkor. I surmise that the reason for this was to prevent anyone not directly connected to the mine from knowing its exact location. Quoting, 1 Samuel 3: 2, "Sons were born to David in Hebron: His firstborn was Amnon the son of Ahinoam of Jezreel;". Coincidentally, according to Wikipedia's Srivijaya web page, a crown prince by the name of Anan-ggavarman was the son of Adityawarman or more correctly Uday-adityavarman, with what in my personal opinion is a completely incorrect date. This would not be too difficult to imagine, since the entire historical period for the so called Khmer Empire actually covers a date that reaches their zenith of power at least 2200 years previous to the 1200 AD designation which is currently accepted by historians. This is where it becomes difficult to separate the actual descendants of historical personages from legend. This is because of the displacement of war...as the historical records begin to become more fragmented and sporadic. At this point we must turn to the actual cultural records of the respective countries in order to fill in the gaps through record reconstruction along with careful but modest biblical comparison. The ancient name for Egypt-Southern Kingdom, is Kmt or Khemet, as seen in conjunction with Egypt-Northern Kingdom of Mera or Ta-Mera, that is from the Nile Delta northward and into Mesopotamia.

THE APPEARANCE OF ZERO IN JUDAH-CAMBODIA AND EDOM-INDIA

From a book Titled: "The Genius of China" by Robert Temple, Introduced by Joseph Needham, Chapter 6 "Mathematics" p. 140, paragraph 3, quoting: "The traditional story for the origin of the symbol '0'for zero, as told in the west, is that it was invented in India in the ninth century AD. It may be seen in an inscription at Gwalior dated 870 AD. However, in actuality, the zero can be traced back earlier than this. It may be seen in inscriptions in Cambodia and Sumatra, both dated 683 AD, and on Bangka Island, off Sumatra, dated 686 AD. Experts believe that these inscriptions, which antedate the use of the zero in India, indicate that the zero came to India from China by way of Indochina."

Again, if the inscriptions showing the zero in Cambodia were written upon the stone monuments dated anywhere near their zenith of power, that is from 1500 BC to 550 BC, and the settlers in Cambodia were originally of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, and furthermore, since those twelve tribes are also recorded as the Twelve Nomadic Tribes which settled Tibet, and represented by the Twelve Stripes on the Tibetan flag. Also, if The Buddha-Shakyamuni is really Moses of the Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures, and Buddha-Moses received enlightenment at the Burning Bush-Bhodi Tree at Lumbini, and was soon after given the Ten Commandments at Bodhanath Stupa in Kathmandu Nepal, circa 2200 BC. Then India geographically received the zero first, even though Joshua-Shiva-Hoshea-Hochi probably arrived in China-Cannan with knowledge of the zero some time within the next 50 years after that. This means that the appearance of zero in India may be traced back to no later than 2200 BC. WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW!

A BRIEF ETYMOLOGY

Wikipedia, Shu (state)... quoting: "Legend states that Shu was ruled at one time by a mythical king, Duyu, and his descendants. Shu was later ruled by the Kaiming kings. During the later half of the Spring and Autumn Period, Shu culture increasingly borrowed from Chu and Ba cultures; for example, Shu copied the practice of boat coffin burials from Ba. The archaeological evidence also shows that Shu interacted with cultures to the south in Yunnan and Guizhou."

King David-Duyu-Udayadityavarman

Khemet-Kaiming-Khemer-Chemarims-Cham-Ham

Judah-Kamboja-Jebus II-Kambuzhou-Zhou-Jew-Chou

Ba-Bali-Ba Bird

Boat burials-Egyptian boat burials

The c. 1400 tomb wall of Sennefer in Western Thebes also illustrates the Eyes of Re with the Third Eye present and Sennefer is holding the Divine Lotus in a manner of Southeast Asian Art particular to statues of Manjushri-Manjush Re.

PUNT-PUNJAB

With ancient Put I or Punt I being located in the Indus Valley Civilization's Punjab of Northwestern India. The first stop or port in maritime trading between Egypt and the Shrivijaya Empire from the period of about 3000 BC to 2200 BC was near the mouth of the ancient Indus, but some evidence exists to indicate that the Southern tip of India to Orissa-Osiris or Konarak-Karnak was also used after Joseph-Hor Aha c. 3000 BC, and into the New Kingdom. So when the Egyptians stated that they were going to Punt, it became standard to refer to their first stop along the way as the peoples of the Punjab. Since the decline of the Indus Valley Civilization at the hands of Aaron-Arayan and the Israelites around 2200 BC, and after about 1900 BC, it would appear that the major trade routes and trading partnership shifted to the Karle-Bhaja group at Mumbai, India or Punt II; which not too long after that also included the Ellora and Ajanta Cave Group's. The reason that I say this is because, several works of rock cut art as well as paintings from these caves appear to mirror those of the Great Srivijaya Empire on Java, Sumatra and Bali, making these Ancient Indonesian Kingdoms major trading partners with Middle and New Kingdom Egypt via Western India. At least one image of the tree of life containing human headed Ba Birds found at Prambanan is also found in the tomb of Panehsy and his Wife in Egypt, and as mentioned above the elongated stupa style from Karle is also found illustrated on the tomb wall of Thutmosis III, the successor of Hatshepsut. When pigmies were brought into Egypt from Punt, the pigmy probably originated on the Island of Flores East of Bali. Other artifacts found in Ancient Egypt claimed to have originated from Punt, include an inscribed bone boomerang which is thought to be exclusive of the aboriginal peoples of the Australo-Polynesian group. Furthermore, during the Egyptian New Kingdom period during the reign of Hatshepsut, relief panels showing raised living quarters or huts on stilts associated with the Land of Punt would indicate that Egyptian maritime traders actually sailed to the Indonesian Archipelago where these types of huts were in common use. The Hatshepsut era panels also show the wife of the ruler of Punt as having heavy folds of skin and fat which is likewise also shown in relief panels at Prambanan on the island of Java-Joppa. These same panels also show her wearing bangle arm and leg bracelets, identical with the Ancient Indus Valley tradition. The hair style (shown on the Hatshepsut reliefs) with ribbon tied at the back of the head of the accompaning retinue to the royal party is likewise identical with that of the so-called "Priest King" of Mohenjo-daro. In a book titled "The Seventy Great Mysteries of Ancient Egypt" edited by Bill Manley, Copyright Thames & Hudson Ltd, London, p. 174, states in the left hand margin: "Right; The chief of Punt, Parehu, and his obese wife, from the scenes in Hatshepsut's temple at Deir el-Bahri". The use of the name "Parehu" is again, employment of the ancient Hebrew word "parah" which is what the name of Ephraim is based upon, the name of Pot-phera priest of On-Oni is based upon, and also what the Egyptian title for Pharaoh is based. So this would indicate that the use of this term in ancient Egyptian records is not the persons name, but their title... Pharaoh, or God King of a rich land. The use of the prefix 'Para' in ancient Indian-Hindu tradition, is many times used in reference to 'rich life', 'kingly', or even within a 'royal' context; as many examples exist within the Joseph-Vishnu Purana, one of the oldest of the Purana's. From the "INSIGHT GUIDE, NEPAL", p. 23, quoting: "The middle hill region, also called the pahar, extends between the Mahabharat and the high Himalaya." From "The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible, Edited by Henry Snyder Gehman", p. 861, (reference to Shechem), quoting: "It lies in the upland valley bounded by Mt. Ebal on the n., and Mt. Gerizim on the s. The valley was known as Mabartha (i.e., pass, or passage), being a pass from the seacoast to the Jordan;". So you all know what I'm thinking about... pahar-parah, Mahabharat-Mabartha, Yarlung Zangpo-Ganges-Jordan, Sikkim-Shechem. WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! Part of the Great Indian Epic known as the Mahabarata was fought along the Southwestern Ridge of the Mahabharat Range in Northwestern India, in which Judah-Kambu-Judesha was also involved in the battle. Oddly enough, we may get our word for "Paradise" from the Hebrew word "Parah" meaning rich land. Also, the Provence of Gujarat or "Gujjaratta" in India, may be recorded in Egyptian texts as Ta-Netjer, not only for its association with the 'Land of God' but also for what the Egyptians designated for its proper name as the "region of Utjenet... Ajanta?" near Punt. I have to surmise that the district or city of Patan, within the Provence of Gujarat, as well as the city of Patan in Nepal may be related to the Ancient Hebrew name Padan as in Padan-aram as these are mentioned in connection with the same Biblical region of Mahanaim as is to Mahayana in Ancient Sanskrit. Since it may be argued that Mahanaim is a region mentioned in the Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures, while Mahayana is a Buddhist School... schools are seen as regions as well as people and vise-versa. It should be finally noted that the remnants of stilt holes near a river in Northern India along with gray-ware shards would indicate that huts were also raised off the ground in and around these areas. One final interesting note: The region of Yam listed in ancient Egyptian records, was often used as the name of a place near or synonymous with Punt. I wonder if reference to Yam meant Yamuna, as in the Yamuna River region near the source of the Indus as well as the Ganges-Jordan Rivers. While the Kingdom of Yemen or Jemen 'may be' listed as Tjemeh in ancient Egyptian records. "Harkuf's narrative" sometime during the Sixth Dynasty, states that it took approx. 7-8 months to journey to Yam and back to Egypt. While no doubt along the voyage route to Punt-Punjab, Yemen long rich in the spice trade less the boomerang's, would be a prime suspect for Yam. But then, even with a caravan load of spices and animals, and just a jump across the mouth of the Red Sea by boat, 7-8 months seems a bit long.

GUJJARATTA-ARATTA

The Mesopotamian's mention the mythical Land of Aratta in the Epic of Enmerkar, which I found in "Babylonians, Peoples of the Past" by H.W.F. SAGGS. Toward the end of Chapter Two titled "Prehistoric Beginnings" p. 38 subtitled "Trade"... Quoting: "We have already noticed epics which touch upon trade during the first half of the third millennium. Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta tells of donkey caravans of corn sent across the Zagros mountains to Aratta in Iran in exchange for semi-precious stones, ". This is too tempting of a correlation to simply ignore. Why should the Mesopotamians mention Gujjaratta without the prefix 'Gujj' attached as the Early Egyptians had done in their spelling "Utjenet" as a land near Punt. So I thought for a moment and looked up "Guge" on Wikipedia. From Wikipedia, quoting: "Guge was an ancient kingdom in Western Tibet. It encompassed the present-day tracts of Zanskar, Upper Kinnaur, Lahul and Spiti (now controlled by modern-day India)." It may be that different countries used different parts of the names of places within certain regions as a form of 'slang' or even possibly to save space when writing the name on clay. Or it may have been that the Kingdom of Guge had not yet annexed the region of Gujjaratta, if it ever was, which seems rather likely due to it's proximity with Ladakh which I believe that later on, after Buddha-Moses and Joshua-Shiva had conquered and the sons of Judah had named after one of their sons. 1 Chronicles 4:21, quoting: "The sons of Shela son of Judah: Er the father of Lecah, Laadah the father of Mareshah and the clans of the linen workers at Beth Asheba,". Please note the postfix "kar" as in Enmer-kar and Zans-kar, and also the postfix "shah" as in Mareshah, the Persian designation for ruler or king. Which also has a Hindu etymology in the kings of Nepal. Which I also looked up on Wikipedia... Wow, Wow, Wow! The dates assigned by modern historians to many of the far eastern cultures, I have found, to be far and away from the actual zenith of these kingdoms. It is even listed in Wikipedia that the so-called Harappan culture of the Indus Valley Civilization was proposed as the area for the Mesopotamian reference to Aratta, without any reason given to adjoin the etymology of the two other than a possible reference to Meluhha. So I suspect that it was merely on the account of the parallel antiquity for the existence of those two cultures that this proposition was made... which would be a good guess in and of itself. It should also be noted that "Gujjar" and "Gujranwala" also from the same geographical area as the kingdom of Guge, all begin with the prefix 'Guj' as in "Guge". I don't think that this is a mere coincidence.

JAIPUR-JIPAR

"Jipar" is also mentioned by Enmerkar, which I believe is the Ancient Capital of the Rajasthan State in the Jaipur District of India. On the website: www.gatewaystobabylon.com, titled "Enmerkar and Aratta" Ref. 1-24, states that: "the E-ana of Unug Kulaba was well founded, and the holy jipar of Inana in brick-built Kulaba shone forth like the silver in the lode". So I went to "Jaipur" on Wikipedia, quoting: "The city was built of pink stucco in imitation of sandstone, and is remarkable among pre-modern Indian cities for the width and regularity of it's streets." "Jaipur is considered by many urbanists to be one of the best planned cities. Almost all Indian towns of that period presented a chaotic picture of narrow twisting lanes, a confusion of run-down forts/temples/palaces and temporary shacks that bore no resemblance at all to the principles set out in Hindu architectural manuals, which calls for strict geometric planning." So you already know what I'm thinking... Did the city planners keep the ancient name and layout for the city of Jaipur, which was so well planned by the Indus Valley Civilization, and further mentioned by Enmerkar in his epic account as "the jipar, the holy place,". He also mentions Aratta in direct reference to a place or structure called Kulaba. Wow! Wow! Wow! And further to note, that Nepal-Naphtali is also mentioned in conjunction with Tibet-Tabbath on the BibleGateway.com page referenced below along with the other 'click-on's'. So it would appear that there is an original city of the Ancient Indus Valley Civilization, or at least its ground plan, that has survived into modern times. This is totally incredible!

MARA-MERA

Last but not least, the Host's of Mara which was the army mentioned in connection with the attack on the Buddha, just happens to be what the Ancient Egyptians called Egypt itself. The name Merah or more correctly, Ta-Mera is the ancient word for Egypt... no kidding. So when Moses was leading the Israelites up out of Egypt, one of the first places that they were supposed to have stopped was the location of the 'bitter waters of Marah'. Wow! Wow! Wow! Futhermore, the Hyksos are really the Kassites... Absolutely! The Ancient Egyptian word for Kassite is Hikau-Khoswet... heh, heh. The Kassite gods are Shimalaya and Shuqamuna-Shakamuni... Really! Also, The modern English name for Egypt is based on the Greek name Aegyptos, which in turn is founded upon the name of a temple in Memphis called "Mansion of the Ka of Ptah" or according to my own translation 'House of the Buddha' or 'House of Moses'... The name of the Egyptian King under which (my research has led me to believe) Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt is Merenre II, where Nitocris was the ruler of Egypt's Northern Kingdom along the Euphrates of Mesopotamia. Which brings us to a very interesting theory. I'm not sure if anyone else has proposed this before myself; but if they have my hat is off to them. The first "Unifier of the Two Lands" has been tentatively identified as Narmer, whom I have found is Ephraim, brother of Menes-Manasseh. Since modern historians consider Memphis to be on the boundary between Upper and Lower Egypt, throughout all periods of Egyptian History. I thought to have the Delta and surrounding areas of Northern Egypt as the only land holdings for a once divided ancient empire, would be ridiculous, considering that Upper Egypt would be ten times the proportionate length of the Nile in area held. What if the reason that the Narmer Palette had a resemblance to Mesopotamian Art is because Ephraim-Narmer took control or "Joined The Two Lands" northward into Mesopotamia and Menes-Manasseh took control over Southern Egypt from Memphis southward. Thus satisfying their long standing feud between First Born Menes-Manasseh on the right of Osiris-Israel being blessed with the left hand and Second Born Ephraim-Narmer receiving the greater blessing on the left with Israel's right hand. This would also explain the mention of Nitocris in relation to Egypt and the flooding of the river corresponding to the Israelites leaving Egypt under Aaron and Ptah-Buddha-Moses, circa 2200 BC.

KYEDORJE-CHEDORLAOMER

Before I continue, I have added this reference near the end (if there really is any end to my blah, blah) to give scholars and researchers alike a more rounded view as to the possible validity of my historical claims. I recently found this old book at the Sonoma County Library, and apparently I'm not the first person to seriously consider the origin for the Sumerians as being from Northern India. While there is no indication that anyone knew that the later Hyksos Dynasties of Egypt were really the Kassites, because these groups are treated as separate but parallel cultures, even in the book which is quoted as follows. It does however, amazingly enough, support my research findings for the earlier 3100 BC (Pre-Messianic or before Ptah-Buddha-Moses of 2200 BC) King of Elam-Ilam as Kyedorje-Chedorlaomer, being of Non-Semetic origin as an Ammorite from Canaan or a Llama-Godking who was a contemporary of Abraham-Brahma... and (most importantly) as originating in the Himalayan region of Eastern Nepal of Northern India. Thank You. From a book titled: "BABYLONIAN LIFE AND HISTORY" by Budge, E.A. Wallis, 1925, pp. 12-13, quoting:

"The question of the race to which the Sumerians belonged has been the subject of many discussions by Assyriologists and others; some authorities think that they were Turanians, and others that they were akin to the Chinese. One thing, however, about them is certain: they were not Semites, and their physical forms, features and characteristics, as represented on the monuments, suggest that they were an offshoot of a people who may have lived in some part of Northern India or in the neighbourhood of Elam. Mr. Buxton, Lecturer in Physical Anthropology at Oxford, has examined the skull of a Sumerian which Prof. Langdon dug up at Kish. According to him, the Sumerian was an Armenoid type, and highly civilized, possessing a head of great brain capacity. The Sumerians were the source whence the Semitic peoples of Babylonia and of Western Asia generally derived their civilization, and literally they taught the rest of mankind their letters."

The way in which the authors, quoted above, treat the intuitive artistic comparisons, that is through the human images in the Mesopotamian archaeological records as appearing to be from Northern India, along with the anthropology of the human skulls, is very impressive. While I do agree with the authors choice for the anthropological origins of the Early Sumerian peoples listed above, and there is far more than a ring of truth to the passing on of the written cuneiform language as a convention or tool of advanced culture. I must part ways with the authors, only on a single point. That is, since I have found that the First Dynasty King of Egypt... Hor-Aha is really Joseph-Horus the son of Osiris-Israel. And his sons Narmer and Menes, are really Ephraim and Manasseh, respectively. And furthermore, that the Entourage of Horus or Shemsuer being Joseph's father Osiris-Israel, and his family from the Caananite region of Sikkim-Shechem. And as I have stated earlier, that I believe that while Menes-Manasseh ruled the Southern Lands of the Nile, that is South of the Delta. His brother, Ephraim-Narmer became Lord and King of Mesopotamia as the Northern Lands of Ancient Egypt around 3000 BC. So it would appear that the Semitic peoples arrived there first. Not that they were the first Inhabitants, but that the Semites derived their civilization from a melting pot of peoples and brought more than their share of cultural ideas into that region. I say this because it is well known that the use of ancient hieroglyphs or picture writing predates that of cuneiform. Of which said hieroglyphs appear to have originated, or at least developed, in Ancient Egypt at a date parallel to that of the Semitic advance. Furthermore, that the Semites did not become the Hebrews until they had resided in Egypt as a peoples. And furthermore, were not known as Hebrews by any other culture outside of Egypt, until after the departure of Ptah-Buddha-Moses in 2200 BC. So one can clearly see from all of this, that the Judean-Guttian Hoards which left Egypt and invaded Mesopotamia at a date which was much later than the arrival of their forefathers into Egypt. Were not total foreigners to the art of writing and actually had plenty of civilized culture of their own.

______________________________________________________________

In the following two internet references:

The first reference, as listed on the Wikipedia "Voltaire" searched page, along the left margin of the main body of the text is shown as a click-on under "Voltaire at 70 years old, an engraving from an 1843 edition of his 'Philosophical Dictionary'."... that takes the reader to a site which lists the etymology of the writings as scanned original works from part of the "Hanover Historical Texts Project", titled "Voltaires Philosophical Dictionary": http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volindex.html and sub-referenced as "Brahmins", in which the commentary by Voltaire himself is shown to be in the context of the first person, as his own thoughts on the matter, where he unequivocally denies any relationship what-so-ever between the Brahmin's and the Hebrews. This completely contradicts the narrative as well as the spirit of the "Note #8" also searched on Wikipedia, under "Abraham", which is listed as a click-on under the second reference immediately following the first paragraph below.

Philosophical Dictionary:

http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volbrahm.html

Line/Paragraph five; in it's entirety.

______________________________________________________________

A second reference on the searched Wikipedia page (since slightly changed) along with removal of ad for same, however the text is still present somewhere on the page, under "Abraham", and toward the bottom of the page, as Note #8,"Voltaire's article", takes the reader to a direct reference which is listed by Wikipedia as a literary connection that Voltaire allegedly makes in a commentary concerning the philosophical writings of "learned men" in the association of Abraham as Brahma, as "Excerpted from" a book (also titled) "Voltaires Philosophical Dictionary".

Note #8:

http://www.truthbeknown.com/abraham.html

Paragraph six; in it's entirety.

______________________________________________________________

Compare: Note #8 referring to Abraham, quoting: "Some learned men" and "Others say that he was the Brahma of the Indians", in the second reference "truthbeknown.com" immediately above. With: the Hanover Project, quote: "The Hebrews, who were known so late, never name the Brahmins; they had no knowledge of India until after the conquests of Alexander,". This is a direct quote of the first reference above in the "history.hanover.edu".

Conclusion: It is highly unlikely that Voltaire would make reference to "learned men" in connection to a statement, even as a commentary... without some refutation or clarification in context with his own original writings as listed in the first click-on above. Especially in the face of Voltaires own knowledge on the subject of India and the Brahmin religion as being so foreign and unknown to the Hebrews. It is true that Abraham is Brahma and Sarah is Sarasvati. What is not true, is that Voltaire ever spoke of it in this context.

This means that at least one of the two references listed above is inaccurate. Guess which one...

Also, since the Muslims firmly believe that Abraham is likewise their ancient forefather, like the Jews and of course the Christians, even though these three have been at controversy with one another over the right of supremacy, though never disallowing the actual existence of Abraham as a historical personage. And considering that Islam has always been at odds with the Hindu religion... that is always, and never considering any correlation what-so-ever. It is even more unlikely that any follower of Islam would have ever mentioned a connection between Abraham and Brahma. For the Muslims truly believe that the Hindus represent a pagan and totally alien faith. It is, therefore, highly doubtful that the religion of Islam would even allow this connection in the first place, and would probably result in excommunication or even a death sentence for anyone that would attempt to make such a connection. So, if the original works of Voltaire contradict any assertion that Abraham is Brahma. And the Muslims, likewise, would never make this assertion. Where would a Wikipedia Editor get the idea to look for this information in the first place?

______________________________________________________________

Next: Egyptian, Cambodian and Buddhist Influences in Olmec and Mayan Art

by Brian S. McMillan

P.S. There is a Mayan ceramic bust picturing Queen Tiy's head, Hat and all! Wow.

Overview of Thutmosis III Tomb art

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KV34

The 'Eyes of Ptah-Buddha-Moses'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Egypt.KV34.07.jpg

Manjush-Re Chariot-Stupa, with

The 'Eyes of Ptah-Buddha-Moses'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Swayambhunath_stupa.jpg

Angkor Wat-King Solomon-Suryavarman II Temple

Note: the Cherub-Prangs identical to Swayambhunath's antenna tower.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Angkor_wat_temple.jpg

Pyramid blocks on barges.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Egypt.KV34.05.jpg

Aaron as Anubis (Seth)? with his staff taming the snakes (controlling water).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Egypt.KV34.06.jpg

Chariot-Stupa in KV 34, goto and then (click on) far lower right corner image...

Pyramid blocks on barges, full image...(click on) very first upper left image...

http://www.thebanmappingproject.com/sites/browse_tombimages_848_20.html

Merenre II and Nitocris

http://www.crystalinks.com/dynasty6.html

i.185, i.186 Nitocris

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/greek-babylon.html

The UPUAUT Project web site.

http://www.cheops.org

Egyptian Pylon (reservoirs) Overview. The Ancient Egyptians used

Obelisk to construct Pylon's as a water retaining device, in order to channel

the water through narrow walled enclosures into the temple proper to lift the

monolithic stones on barges, up to their supports.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pylon_%28architecture%29

______________________________________________________________

Hagia Sophia, Wikipedia, Quoting: "The building was rebuilt under the

supervision of Emperor Justinian I and rededicated on December 27, 537."

Nearly 100 years prior to the current date assigned to the ascension of

Muhammad from the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem IV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aya_sofya.jpg

Plan of the Temple of King Herod in Jerusalem IV, of which base the

Dome of the Rock is built upon. If you study the Muslim-Judeo-Christian Temple

Mount, you may just find out what I see... if you don't see what I see, you will

just have to wait for the movie. Good luck!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Secondtempleplan.jpg

Etymology for "Shah", Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shah

Guge, Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guge

Aratta, Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aratta

Indus Valley Civilization, Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilization

Tabbath, BibleGateway.com

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=7&chapter=7&verse=21&end_verse=23&version=72&context=context

Jaipur, India, Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaipur#History

Enmerkar and Aratta - www.GatewaystoBabylon.com, Ref. 1-24

http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/myths/texts/classic/enmerkaratta.htm

______________________________________________________________

Also:

http://www.godkings.com/godkingstourimages.html

http://www.godkings.com/biblekings.txt

http://www.godkings.com/mainpage.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20060301185515/http://buddhamoses.com/

http://www.godkings.com/info.txt

http://www.godkings.com/

http://www.godkings.com/ufo.jpg

http://www.godkings.com/new.mov

SYMBOLIC IDENTIFICATION

OF THE INDUS SCRIPT

by Brian S. McMillan

There is quite a bit of historical research behind what I believe I've found, and please remember that I am only an amateur at this. So I will try and make this as brief as possible. I first came across this image, below... in a book titled: "A PEACEFUL REALM: The Rise And Fall Of The Indus Civilization", by Jane McIntosh 2002, p. 152, figure 50. I am at this time, not yet able to actually decipher the script. However, I think that I am able to shed some light on how to read it, and also, I have been able to correctly identify some of the symbols or logo-grams. While the exact context of the script has eluded me, it might be important to remember that identifying some of the characters, as well as the way in which the script might be read is a key to understanding any language, ancient or not. An actual image of this Indus seal may be found at www.harappa.com in the click-on below. Since the seals have so few characters or symbols written on them, at any one time, I will hazard a guess that they mean the same thing when read from right to left, or from left to right. For example: If we view this particular seal as rather typical of all Indus seals, then from right to left it would go something like this. Man-Tool, Sun-Quantity-Man-Job, Sun-Vessel-Land-Man. As read from left to right. Man-Land-Vessel-Sun, Job-Man-Quantity-Sun, Tool-Man. See... the same. So because of this, it would make the picture writing, in reality... somewhat partial ideograms. It would appear that these seals were used as some form of records for contracted labor and resources, or even as a form of ancient credit cards. I have found some very interesting meanings for the seals representing the Brahman and the animal motif, as well as the identification of other symbols. But for now I will only discuss the seal below. OK, here's one clue, Abraham is Brahma, and Sarah is Sarasvati, no kidding.

Briefly, what led me to this was two fold. First, I had done some reading on the subject of Sumerian history, and found that every scholar agrees, not surprisingly, that before the early Mesopotamians had used cuneiform, they wrote with pictures. No revelation here... I've known this since I was a child. Now I've reviewed a few articles on the subject of the Indus script, and found that one of the themes concerning the inability for decipherment is that the Indus script was isolated and unknown. This reasoning didn't set well with me. Because, if the Early Indus Civilization was a major trading center, and items from the Indus Valley, such as beads, have been found in Ancient Mesopotamia, then why would the Indus Civilization use a script that would be illegible and obscure to their trading partners. You might have a few variations in convention, but for the most part, the lingua-franca would remain just that. Second, the Sumerian culture could not have been the only group that the Indus civilization, traded with. In the same way that I had determined that the Ancient Egyptian name for Hyksos (Hikau-Khoswet), was really their name for Kassites, or The Great Kassites, to be exact. I had found, just as plausibly, that the Land of Punt, was the Ancient Egyptian word for Punjab, and Bingo!

Since the Ancient Egyptians used picture writing, dating back as far in history as any other civilization that we know, I had to take a look at some of their symbols as well. Well I found a few. And again, these same symbols are found in all three cultures. We know what they mean in Ancient Mesopotamian picture writing, and we know what they mean in Ancient Egyptian. Since both of the those languages later evolved into a phonetic and syllabic usage; we need only concern ourselves, for now, with a proper identification of the ancient pictographic symbols in use from about 3100 B.C. to 2,300 B.C., or the equivalent of the Pre-Dynastic Egyptian period through most of the Old Kingdom period.

In a book titled: "Babylonian Life and History" by Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1925. p.p. 19, and 190-195, show some of the examples of the genesis for these rare examples which I was able to review in my dissertation below.

One of the symbols that appears on the Indus seals, that is present in both Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, is the symbol for "House" or "Land of Owner". This symbol may be seen in the third row down, third from left. It may simply be identified as "Domain", but in some contexts may be more correctly interpreted as "Temple" or even "Kings House or Land". Another, which appears in all three cultures, immediately to its left, is the "Vessel" or "Storage Jar" symbol.

Another symbol which appears in ancient Mesopotamian picture language, and at the beginning of the second and third row below, is the symbol for the "Sun" or "Rising Sun". Now it has been elongated by the Indus culture, presumably so it would fit in the rather small writing space, which is available on the seals. The use of this symbol in two places on the Indus seal, indicates a period of time. For instance, from this day to the next, or final day. It could be indicative of a season of the year, or of a period of days beginning and ending with a number which is represented by the notches in the second row, second symbol from the left. The notches, which are arranged on the seal as four rows across, and three rows down, appear to indicate a smaller quantity of the larger notch immediately to their right, and immediately to the left of the "Man Holding Bow and Arrow", the last symbol at the far right of the second row. The appearance of the Slash or "Tool" symbol is also inscribed on the lip of storage jars along with the symbol for the Bow, which the man is holding with the Arrow symbol, in his hand. Now I got to thinking... what if the storage jars held seed or grain that was designated for planting. This would mean that the "Bow and Arrow" symbols could be an "Adze and Plow". The reading of the seal would then go something like this. For example:

1. Man holding farm implement agrees to plant and harvest so many acres from the beginning to the end of this season, and will get so many storage jars of seed to plant on a certain amount of the king's land, in exchange for the rest of the yield for his own house hold.

2. It may even be that the storage jars were destined as food for a, conscripted oarsman, on a boat, to which the man below is seen holding, as a sign of his occupation on the one hand, and along with the boat in the other. The use of the "House" or "Land" symbol, in this case, could be the allocation to that governor or land bearer, for the conscripted oarsman.

A couple more tries at interpretation. If the symbol which is marked out in vertical and horizontal lines, second from the last, and looking at it as is from left to right, with right being last; is the symbol for the temple. And the "Bow" symbol means "Bow Maker" in Chinese Shang picture writing. Or the "Bow" is actually a string saw for applying grit. And The "Stick" or "Arrow" is a "Leverage Stick" for Stringing a Bow, or for Masonry. Then the symbols might read something like this.

3. Man holding tool agrees to be bow maker or mason in the service of the Brahman Clan leader, for a period of one month and twelve days, or one year and twelve days. In exchange he may use his contract sealing as proof of employment to enjoy the allotment of grain on the "Grain Jars" which are marked for the temple workers with the same symbols as the man is holding, during the period of his employment.

4. OK, this is my last try... If we consider that all the images of the man holding a tool actually represents a man holding a weapon, and the SUN symbol is viewed as representing a SHIELD in profile. Then the seal could read something like this: Man employed in the service of the "Temple" agrees to be a "Guard" or carry out "Military Service" for a period which is indicated by the notches or may access the grain allotted by those same notches, (since the notches would be raised and could be chipped off as the "Guard" or "Soldier" used his allotment), and to protect the province while under service of the Clan Chief.

At any rate, I believe the symbols for "Land or House or Temple" and "Sun", have been correctly identified. It would appear that the "Land" symbol has been sectioned off in such a way as to indicate a percentage of the owner's area. In this case, I would have to go with the third interpretation. I do realize that if the SUN symbol actually represents a SHIELD, that my interpretation for the SUN symbol would be in error, however, it would be naive of me not to think that there would be some sort of warrior class within the Indus Civilization, during a time in history when battles between other city states were almost a daily occurrence.

x xx

xx xx

xxx x

x x

x xx xx x

x xx x x

xx x xx

xxx

x x

xx x

xx xx

Man holding Tool

xx xx xx xx xx xx x xxx

xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx

xx xx xx xx xx x x x xx

x xxx x x xx

x x xx xx xx xx xxx xx x x x x x

x x xx xx xx xx xxx x xx x xx xx

x x xx xx xx xx xxx x x xx xx

x x xxx x x x x

x xx xx xx xx x x x x

xx xx xx xx xx x x xx x

xx xx xx xx xx x x xx xx

xx xx xx

Sun Number or Quantity Tool Man-Job

xx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx

xx xx xx x x x x xx

xx xx xx xxxxxxxxxxx x xx

x x xx x x x xx xx

x x x x x x x xx x x

x x x x x x x xx x xx x

x x x x x x x xx xx x xx

x x x x x x x xx x

x x x x x x xx xx

xx x x x x x xx xx x