"On The Electronic Composition of Matter and Energy" 
with Law, Rule, Gravity I and II, Newton, Mossbauer 
and Carl D. Anderson quotes, by Brian S. McMillan

The basis of this theory or any physical theory,
must include this rule.  And the rule is that; there 
is no such thing as a "massless" object or property.  
Any "Thing" or "Property" that may be associated
with-or measured, including energy, must exist in
3-dimensions.  That is it must possess "volume"
and therefore "mass".  It may not "exist" as a
dimensionless "object" or "property".  

Since duration accompanies material process,
and the human mind is "self aware" because of
a neural-chemical reaction, the reaction of the 
internal chemical mind attempts to synchronize 
this sensory data with external process, and this 
is perceived as "time".

Therefore,  "Time" does "not" exist.  Time is a 
concept of the human imagination and cannot be 
measured apart from the increment or physical 
object that is used as a comparison.  
However, the effects of "Kinetic Energy" can be 
observed without an artifactual relationship.  
The use of "Time" as a unit of measure, is in 
relation to the "motion of matter in space" and 
this in relation to a defined "period" or "cycle".  
Hence, there is no such thing as non-dimensional 
"Action at a distance".  All energy, force or field 
must act through physical agency or dimensional 
vehicle.  

Our perception also plays a major role in the way 
we interpret physical laws, including gravity.  For 
example:  When we see a rock fall, the rock is not 
actually falling... it is the Earth which is moving 
into the rock.  Since our bodies are already stuck 
to the ground, we do not experience this motion 
as falling, we experience this motion as Gravity 
One.  Because everything else is also grounded, 
we believe that the Earth Reference Frame is 
stationary... when in reality we are hurtling 
through space on a spinning ball.  

Since "nothing" can exist in "less or more" than
3-dimensions (at least, not so far as anyone
has been able to prove) and material volume is 
measured in the dimensions of x,y,z; that is, it 
has height, width and depth.  This is measured as
a solid, liquid, gas or plasma of any fundamental 
unit of the material to be measured, and this, in 
relation to a finite bounded volume.
  
Let us now propose that a dimension-4 were to 
exist that has dominion over the previous 
3-dimensions.  The dimension we are proposing 
has no physical property, that it is--in essence--
dimensionless.  We are now using "two different" 
definitions of dimension, only one of which can 
be correct.  

If we assume that the existence of the physical 
material could not depend upon its own properties 
for the characteristics that we may observe, and we 
attempt to explain this through a dimension of 
"time".... Then we are employing an emissary to a 
surrogate reality--by simply dismissing the 
naturally ordained properties of the materials in 
favor of adding a new, dimensionless dimension, 
to the universal laws of physics, and therefore, to
reality.  The only reality that is dimensionless is a 
vacuum.  And a "vacuum" is the only definition of
non-existance.  That is... "it" "isn't".  

Hence, the opposite of material volume, is a vacuum,
or the absence of matter.  Where a vacuum or the
absence of matter can only be determined in relation
to the physical, and only where there is no material
resistance.  An absolute vacuum has no property or
possession.  Nothing cannot be implied, but rather
it is absolute.  There is no scale, no magnitude,
no curvature, no matter how large or small; because,
in an infinite universe only the state of the
material may be measured.  So if it is found that
our "bubble" or universe is one of many, then it
must be that there is a "Super Universe" which is
infinite.  In an infinite universe, there is no
need for topology or time.  "What's on the outside of
outside".  Where everything prior to the "Big Bang" or 
"Big Implosion" as I call it, was a continuous material 
of "negative curvature".
That is a continuous solid of neutrino stuff with
bubbles of "space".
  
However, now everything in our universe, is composed 
of fundamental objects of positive curvature.
The most basic of these objects being the "neutrino"
or "little neutral one".  Every electron is composed
of two neutrino.  And a neutrino can only bind with
another neutrino to form one electron.  Therefore,
all higher order materials must first proceed from
the electron phase.  For example:

IF:   (8 * r^3 - 4/3 * pi * r^3)
WHERE: r = 2.99792458 = c
THEN: (8 * c^3 - 4/3 * pi * c^3)^2 * 2 pi = h Plank

So it must be that the material and the vacuum
proceed simultaneously.  That is they have always
coexisted.  Where before the "Big Bang" the
"material" or "neutrino stuff" occupied the area
between bubbles, which are of equal volume; that is
they are symmetric with no regard to size or
magnitude.  Hence; the well known rule in physics
is that; matter can neither be "created" nor 
"destroyed", only "changed".
This, therefore, begs for the existence of a
fifth state of matter.  One in which a "Newtonian
Solid" is a material with a single "relative"
property.  It can change shape.  The neutrino is
the "currency" of our universe.

>>1.673774 /10^27 * 6.022136736 *10^23 
>>= .001007969589 molar mass hydrogen
.00100797 maximum listed value

>>1.673774 /10^27 - 1.263 * 9.10938716 /10^31
>>= 1.672623484 /10^27 kg mass proton

>>1.673774 /10^27 + 1.263 * 9.10938716 /10^31 
>>= 1.674924516 /10^27 kg mass neutron

Hint:  All "international Standard Units" tables, list 
           the "neutron" as heavier than "hydrogen".  
           A "nucleon" is listed as heavier than an 
           "atom".  
                                   JDS.

Since the neutron to proton decay mode has been 
observed in a laboratory to consist of a single free 
electron accompanied by one anti-neutrino.

And since the hydrogen to proton decay mode has 
been theorized as a loss of a single free electron 
to yield the hydrogen nucleus.

Furthermore, the emissions state for a lepton
such as an electron or neutrino should not be
significantly different for the neutron to proton or
a hydrogen to proton decay mode.  And
according to the above mathematical view, one
mode or the other may be possible... but not
both.

For the total free electron mass separating the 
neutron from the proton is equivalent to a 
minimum of 2.5 electron masses.  This leaves a 
discrepancy for either mode of decay which cannot 
be explained in terms of an energy deficit or 
through comparison with any known emissions 
energies associated with beta decay modes.

If we view the current state of modern physical 
theory for the composition of a hydrogen atom as 
a single electron encircling or (orbiting) a single 
proton which comprises the hydrogen nucleus.

And we move to consider that an electron is the 
smallest physical object in "possession" of "charge".  
Then, according to the currently accepted model, 
it must be that the effectual field or charge on the 
electron must extend far beyond the physical 
dimensions of the electron itself, and that this 
"field" must be something other than that which 
comprises the structure, mass or volume of the 
electron.  This is "not" possible!

To correct this, let us further propose that all 
magnetic fields (that is lines of flux) are composed 
of alternating electron-positron "STRING".  We are 
no longer left with some unknown force or field, 
acting as a mediator between the proton and the 
alleged single electron which orbits it.  Furthermore, 
it must be clear from the standpoint of this model 
that electronic "charge" must act through its own 
physical kinetic boundaries or extend no further 
than the dimensions of the electron itself.
  
Hence, electrons must therefore, touch each other 
in such a way as to be connected through some 
mode of physical exchange inherent in their 
composition or become deflected through hard 
collision.  And since this physical atomic model 
does not allow for a "non-kinetic" vehicle with 
regard to "charge" or "magnetism", or through any 
mode of exchange other than a kinetic neutrino 
"two neutrino form one electron" with dimensions 
less than that which is associated with the electron, 
or of greater dimensional proportions without being 
composed of more than one electron.  We are again, 
left with a structure of electronic nature which is 
responsible for lines of magnetism and the "Shells" 
of atomic composition.

There is no abstract "action at a distance" 
without physical or material arbitration.  This is 
the "Reductio-ad-absurdum" for physical process.  
The laws for conservation of energy and momentum 
must apply for all objects defined through separate 
domain and independently of their respective 
magnitudes.  That is including those objects of a 
most fundamental or rudimentary nature, such as 
the neutrino.

Hence, it must be that the "Quantum Hall Effect", 
operates through a vehicle other than the one 
which is currently recognized; such as a 
non-paradoxical admission of field effects 
communication.  For example:  The 
"earth's geomagnetic field".

Unless a laboratory uses some form of "total" 
geomagnetic shielding during the course of its 
measurements.  Then there is no physical agent 
other than a neutrino or another electron which 
could account for this quantum disturbance.  
There is also no way to unequivocally prove this 
assertion other than through some form of rigorous 
experiment.  
If this form of experiment is of the type which is 
ultimately chosen, then the magnetic shielding 
"Must Be Total".  

There are two forms of "gravity"... that is, what we 
have come to think of as a single "force"... both of 
which are, in reality, "EFFECTS"... "Gravity I" 
inertia, and "Gravity II" electromagnetism.  

Where the first form of "Gravity I" is simply 
momentum.  
And to this end, a result of the relative acceleration
of two or more massive bodies through simple 
physical contact by sharing a common kinetic 
agent or reference frame.  Including the breaking 
or establishing a connection by a quasi-rigid tether 
made of any material what-so-ever.  In the case of 
atoms, this material is electricity.  

Where the second form of "Gravity II" is composed 
of "filaments" or a "thread" of alternating 
electron-positron STRING, and acting between 
celestial bodies or their environs on a planetary, 
stellar or galactic scale.  This is the configuration 
and composition of common magnetism.  

If two objects of equal size, share a boson as a form
of kinetic exchange... that is a natural, fundamental 
mode of communication inherent in their operation 
or existence.  
Then, it must be that the boson is of equal or lesser
mass than the objects which have it in common.  

If the shared object is of greater collective mass, 
then it must be that the suspected "boson" is not 
fundamental but rather a collection of fundamental 
objects acting as a field between two bodies which 
are themselves not fundamental, but rather a 
collection of more rudimentary objects.  Or that all 
of the participating objects are merely material 
masses acting as projectiles do, in a common 
setting involving collision.  

This is because, it is impossible for a fundamental 
object to share, as a mode of exchange, any other 
object which is less fundamental than itself.  
In other words, this would violate the law for the 
conservation of energy and momentum as well as 
entropy.  

It would be like asking nature to "step over a dollar" 
to "pick up a nickel".  
Or like "picking yourself up by your own bootstraps". 
Can God create a rock so heavy, that he can't lift it?"   

Every electron is composed of two neutrino and 
this is what they look like.  

If one were to take a cross bar tire iron looking like 
a 'plus sign' or a 'multiplication symbol' and remove 
the weld in the center.  This would leave two bars 
counter rotating around a common center, and 
since the neutrino is shapeless, the momentum in 
turn causes the material mass of the two neutrinos 
to be thrown outward and bulge at the tips while 
becoming thin at the point of contact.  This 
actually resembles two 'Q-Tips' crossing at their 
centers and becoming the configuration of every 
electron or positron.  This is how the electron and 
positron are able to bind together to form magnetic 
lines of flux.  As well as all higher order matter in 
the universe.  This is accomplished by the two 
neutrino electron's 4 bulging tips as two of the tips 
cross and grab it's neighbor while the other two 
tips are each 90 degrees out of phase with their 
counterparts; that is not touching their neighbors.  
They then begin to swing into position and as their 
tips begin to touch their neighbors... the other two 
tips start to disconnect.  And this is accomplished 
by as many alternating electron-positron units that 
their is available in the pool of electrons to be 
used... in the case of light, they can be billions of 
light years in length.  Like interconnected gears 
they do the electromagnetic lines of flux timing 
dance to form the strongest and most primary 
"STRING" in the universe.  This is how the shell's 
of atoms are configured.  This is how Gravity II 
Standing Radio Emissions are configured.  This is 
the configuration and composition of common 
magnetism.  

In the mid 1960's I was in my back yard with two 
pieces of 4 foot re-bar that I had picked up off the 
street a few blocks away from my home.  I got to 
looking at them and I don't know why I did this.. 
but the next thing that I did was to stand in the 
middle of the back yard and throw one re-bar up in 
the air and rotate my body 90 degrees and then as 
the first bar was just beginning to come back down, 
I then threw the next bar up to meet it in the 
center and crossing at their middle.  While I was 
running away, I looked over my shoulder and 
watched as the first piece rebounded almost 
straight in the air... nothing interesting yet.  But wait! 
I tried it a second time, but this time I threw the bar 
harder and waited a little longer to throw the second.  
While running away from the scene, I looked over my 
shoulder and saw the most wonderful thing.  The 
two pieces of re-bar were both spinning around in 
mid-air... like floating for a second.  Wow Wow Wow.  
I couldn't even believe it.  No glue, no hook's, no 
breaking apart.  They came down and plowed into 
the grass and dirt just like they were in mid-air... 
almost still touching in the middle and two of their 
four legs or tips stuck in the ground.  My granny was 
doing dishes and watching me from the window.  I 
ran in the house and yelled, "Did you see that"... and 
she said "I sure did".  

It wasn't until 1980 that I theorized that the structure 
of the electron had to be something like this... and it 
wasn't until sometime between 1992 and 1995 that I 
was certain that the two neutrino electronic structure 
was exactly how I described above.  This is because, 
apart from hard deflection, the counter rotating 
structure described above is the simplest mechanism 
of interaction that nature could ever devise... and is 
subsequently the first form of mechanical bonding 
between the most fundamental units of matter in the 
universe... the neutrino.  The most fundamental 
building block.  


Signed: "LUCKY MAN"


In the following version most of the associated 
magnitudes and units for the actual Fundamental 
Constants of Physics have been purposely left out for 
reasons of brevity.  Therefore, only the ratios or 
proportions have been retained.  And are reflected in 
the associated description for each constant.  For 
example:  The Constant of Molar Volume is reflected by
the application of the two units in the theory... such
as "number" times "meters" equal Volume.  In other 
words the mathematical placement of the constants 
agree with the individual values which are yielded in 
description as well as calculation... individually as 
well as in concert... Spatially as well as 
dimensionally. 
Every object in the theory has it's counterpart in 
reality. 

The associated constant immediately below left of the 
yielded value is, in most cases, borrowed from the CRC
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 79th Edition, 
subtitled Fundamental Physical Constants. 

>>1.511091462/10^32 kg = emu-electronic mass unit 

>>18381 * 1.511091462/10^32 * 6.02213713 * 10^0 
>>= 1.672671/10^27 kg mass proton 

>>18406 * 1.511091462/10^32 * 6.02213713 * 10^0 
>>= 1.674946/10^27 kg mass neutron 

>>(18381+92380) * 1.511091462/10^32 
>>= 1.6737/10^27 kg mass hydrogen 

>>(18381+92380) * 1.511091462/10^32 * 6.02213713 * 
>>10^23 
>>= .0010079251 molar mass hydrogen 
.00100794 

>>(2.99792458^2 * 92380 * 2)^-1 
>>= 6.02213713 Avogadro constant
6.0221367(36) 

>>(1838.1/92380)^(1/2) 
>>= 1.410573071 shielded proton moment
1.41057138(47) 

>>10^5 Pa * 92380 * 2.4263/10^12 meter 
>>= .0224141594 constant of molar volume 
.02241410(19) 

>>2.99792458^2 * 92380 * 2 
>>= 1.660540068 amu-atomic mass unit
1.6605402(10) 

>>((1.511091462 * 6.02213713)(92380-18381))^(1/2)/pi^2
>>= 8.314456705 molar gas constant 1st variation 

>>((1.511091462 * 6.02213713)(92380-18380))^(1/2)/pi^2
>>= 8.314512886 molar gas constant
8.314510(70) 

>>((1.511091462 / 6.02213713)(92380-18380))^(1/2)/pi^2
>>= 1.380658179 Boltzman constant
1.380658(12) 

>>1.674946/2.99792458^2/92380/2.4263 
>>= 8.314515515 molar gas constant 

>>((18381+92380)/16.02187159)^(1/2) 
>>= 8.314512885 molar gas constant
8.314510(70) 

>>(92380+18381)/(92380-18380)/1.511091462*pi^4 
>>= 9.648590782 Faraday constant
9.6485309(29) 

>>(1-2.99792458^2/16.02187159)^(1/2) 
>>= 6.626045764 Planck constant-Lorentz transformation

>>6.626045764/2.99792458/9.109388428 
>>= 2.4263 de Broglie wave equation electron 
2.42631058(22) 

>>(1838.2/92380)^(1/2) 
>>= 1.410611441 proton magnetic moment
1.41060761(47) 

>>(1838.2 * 2.4263)^(1/3) * 2/3 
>>= 1.097373565 Rydberg constant 
1.0973731534(13) 

>>10^5 Pa * 18382 * 2.4263/10^12 meter 
>>= .00446002466 constant of nuclear volume 
new constant (second generation) 

>>(20pi/92380* (2/3)^3 * 18381 * 2.4263)^(1/2) 
>>= 2.997925825 speed of light in vacuum 
2.997924579 

>>(1.410572485^2 *2pi* (2/3)^3 * 2.4263)^(1/2) 
>>= 2.997924579 c (exact) 
2.997924579 

>>(911 + pi)^(1/3) /4 
>>= 2.4263 electron Compton wavelength-full abstract 

>>6.02213713 * 2 * 92380 /4pi 
>>= 8.854187818 permittivity constant
8.854187818 

>>4pi/92380 
>>= 13.60291255 eV binding energy hydrogen 
13.6056981(40) 

>>80*(92380/18380)^(1/3) 
>>= 137.0358308 inverse fine-structure 
137.0359895(61) 

>>(18380/92380)^(1/3)*3/4pi/(2.4263*1838.2)^(1/3)/16 
>>= 5.291776636 Bohr radius hydrogen 
5.29177249(24) 

>>(5.291776636/10^11)^3/9.80665 
>>= 1.511067406/10^32 kg emu-theoretic value 

>>(10^5*2.4263/10^12/2)^(1/2) *pi/10^23*3/2/9.80665 
>>= 1.673700352/10^27 kg mass hydrogen 

>>(18381+92380) * 1.511091462/10^32 kg 
>>= 1.673700014/10^27 kg mass hydrogen 

>>(1.602187159/18381/8)^(1/2)* 
>>(6.67260226/9.80665)^(1/4) 
>>= 2.99792458 c speed of light 

>>9.80665*10^5 Pa*(18381/92380)^2* 
>>(4*1.660540068/10^27/1.602187159*10^19)^2 
>>= 6.672602255/10^11 G Gravity Newtonian 

>>(10^23*1.673700014/10^27 kg*9.80665*2/3)^2* 
>>2*92380/pi^2 
>>= .02241415035 constant of molar volume 
.02241410(19) 

This last equation above agrees with our original 
formula for the constant of molar volume as derived 
to within seven significant figures thus. 

>>10^5 Pa * 2.4263/10^12 meter * 92380 
>> = .0224141594 constant of molar volume 
.02241410(19) 

With the mathematically derived Rydberg constant 
above which include the components of the electron 
wavelength multiplied by the number of 
electron/positron units which yield the value for the 
proton magnetic moment... a new constant can now be 
confirmed and added to the International Standard of 
Units for the fundamental constants of physics.  The 
"constant of nuclear volume" (second generation) 

This strongly indicates that the string of 92380 
electron/positron units which forms a single orbital 
around the nucleus of the hydrogen atom is connected 
at all times with at least one or more of the 18381 
electron/positron units which form the single proton 
of that nucleus leading to a measurement of 18382 
body of units and confirmed by the yield for the 
constant of Rydberg as the result of a rotating or 
precessing near circular or elliptical structure. 

The actual relationship between the Rydberg constant 
and the constant of molar volume then becomes 
manifest as a proportion between the two values 
for the Rydberg and electron wavelength constants 
in connection with the hydrogen shell count of 92380 
electrons, and yielding the proton magnetic moment, 
borrowed from the CRC Handbook 79th edition as 
given to 8,6 and 8 significant figures respectively. 

>>((.10973731*3/2)^3/2.42631/92380)^(1/2) 
>>= 1.410607637 
1.41060761(47) 

Of which Rydberg constant becomes a simplified 
relationship between the proton magnetic moment 
and the constant of molar volume... thus: 

>> 2/3 * (1.410611441^2 * 2.24141594)^(1/3) 
>>= 1.097373565 Rydberg constant 
1.0973731534(13) 

All current theories concerning the structure of the 
hydrogen atom state that one electron surrounds a 
single proton composed of three quarks... This is NOT 
TRUE! 
The hydrogen atom actually has a STRING of 92380 
electron-positron units forming a "basket" or "web" 
which encloses a single proton which is composed of 
18381 electron-positron units alternating like black 
and white pearls on a pearl necklace. 
EVERYTHINGS ELECTRONS and heres PROOF! 

>>1.511091462/10^32 kg * 6.02213713 * 10^23 * 

>>(2*18381 + 2*18406 + 366273) 
>>= .0040026077 molar mass helium
.00400260 

>>(3*18381 + 4*18406 + 633981) 
>>= .0069410068 molar mass lithium
.006941 

>>(4*18381 + 5*18406 + 824796) 
>>= .009012185  molar mass beryllium
.00901218 

>>(5*18381 + 6*18406 + 985572) 
>>= .0108100083 molar mass boron
.01081 

>>(6*18381 + 6*18406 + 1099185) 
>>= .012111537 molar mass carbon 
.0121115 

>>(7*18381 + 7*18406 + 1281689) 
>>= .0140067018 molar mass nitrogen 
.0140067 

>>(8*18381 + 8*18406 + 1463880) 
>>= .0159994016 molar mass oxygen
.0159994 

>>(9*18381 + 10*18406 + 1738248) 
>>= .0189984067 molar mass fluorine 
.01899840 

>>(10*18381 + 10*18406 + 1849603) 
>>= .0201790043 molar mass neon
.020179 

>>(11*18381 + 12*18406 + 2103286) 
>>= .0229897759 molar mass sodium
.02298977 

Since all atoms larger than hydrogen, are 
theoretically based to be built upon the structural 
constraints for the ground state of hydrogen.  This 
means that the nuclei as well as the shells of all 
atoms are a real and continuous construction, made up 
of finite parts or individual units of electron, which
ultimately dictates the dimensional boundaries of the 
molecule.

Signed: Brian S. McMillan "LUCKY MAN" 

PS: The values for the elements above are based upon, 
Appendix E, A26. Periodic Table of the Elements. 
Physics Parts 1 and 2.  Halliday-Resnick.  Third 
Edition. 

PSS: The following expansion for the shielded proton 
magnetic moment has been included only as an example 
for scientific scrutiny.  As the simplified 
representation is a more accurate reflection for the 
interaction of the integral parts and should be seen 
through the eyes of a more well rounded theory. 

>>(1/2*10^-5 Pa*18381/92380^2/6.02213713/10^23/ 
>>2.99792458^2/10^16)^(1/2) = 1.410573071/10^26 J T^-1

>>U'p exact 

PPSS: Every electron is composed of two 
neutrino...however that is another matter... heh heh! 
NEXT: On The Nature of Gravity 

Between the two values... that of hydrogen and the 
proton, only one of these can be empirically 
measured... Can you guess which one....You got it! 
Hydrogen. Because, the hydrogen atom can be 
measured directly by concentrating an enormous 
number of atoms in a container.  And since the 
weight of the container is known and through 
Avogadro's law, the approximate number of atoms in 
the container may be obtained.  We separate the 
weight of the container from the weight of the 
hydrogen gas and voila! 

HENCE: 92380 * 2^(1/2) * 2.81794092/10^15 /2pi/ 
5.29177249 * 10^11 = 1.107245201 times nuclear 
circumference. 

Which means that with the dimensional radius of the 
electron and hydrogen atom thought to be known, we 
can now take our electron-positron shell count and 
multiply it by the square root of two times the 
radius of the electron, which is a direct way of 
measuring permeability as an exact geometric 
parameter, and then dividing by the Bohr 
circumference to yield the number of times the 
electron string makes a complete revolution around 
the nucleus... 

If the above yield for the number of times the 
electron-positron string circles the nucleus is 
correct. 
That is only about 1.1 times... then this means 
that the shell of the hydrogen atom is probably 
slightly elliptical, and operates in connection with
the proton to yield all of the values of spectra as 
well as the ionization constants  and binding
energies. 

One last equation in support of the this model. 

IF: 5.291804717/10^11 = Bohr radius (close approx.) 

THEN: (5.291804717/10^11)^3/9.80665 
>>= 1.511091462/10^32 kg emu-electronic mass unit 

Question from U.E 

> >>1.511091462/10^32 kg = emu-electronic mass unit 

What is this unit? It is electronmass / (N_A * 
10^-22)? 
N_A is Avogadros??number (6.02213713*10^23). Then you 
are using 
an electron mass with only two or three significant 
digits! 

Regards, censored 

Response to U.E. 

How do you know, that it is not the other way around? 
In other words the free electron mass can be derived 
thus: 

IF: 1.511091462/10^32 kg/ 
>>(1-2.99751208^2/2.99792458^2)^(1/2) 
>>= 9.109385168/10^31 kg 

OR: 9.1/10^32/(1-2.982928332^2/2.99792458^2)^(1/2) 
>>= 9.109388561/10^31 kg 

This application of the Lorentz Transformation, 
illustrates how easy it might be to demonstrate a 
relationship between the actual mass or bound mass 
of the electron and an accelerated mass or free 
electron mass that is currently recognized in 
International Standard Units. 

There are other candidates for the electron mass 
unit, as well as for the proton and total hydrogen 
count... however, all are derivatives of 
10^23 * 9.1/10^32 * (18381 + 92380) 
>>= .0010079251 molar mass hydrogen 

IF: 9.1/10^32 kg * 18381 = 1.672671/10^27 kg 

Since, in the first case we obtain the molar mass of 
the hydrogen atom and in the second case we achieve 
the kilogram mass of the proton-both from 9.1/10^32...

and, of the two recognized values... since hydrogen is
the only one that can be empirically determined we 
must base the kilogram value on the unit which yields 
the mass of hydrogen in kilograms. 
However, there are values which are derivatives that 
will also work equally well... It is merely a 
coincidence that the electronic mass unit is so 
close to 9.1... the actual value may be closer to 
9.09994.../10^9/6.02213713/10^23 
>>= 1.511081499/10^32 kg or something else! 

Einstein, proposed that as objects approach the speed 
of light, that they will appear to increase in mass. 
From this, I was able to determine that the free 
electron mass in SI was in fact an accelerated mass...

That is NOT a true REST MASS. 

Thank You A.E. 
Signed Brian S. McMillan 

PS. The original base values yield a set of 
relationships with those values and the fundamental 
constants as well as the table of the elements that 
cannot easily be dismissed. 

"Lucky Man" Santa Rosa, California 

The following excerpt, copied from the original text, 
by Carl D. Anderson on the "Production and Properties 
of Positrons"; Nobel lecture presented at Stockholm, 
December 12, 1936, pp. 9-10, subtitled "Positrons of 
High Energy".  Supports first principals with regard 
to the electronic composition of cosmic radiation. 
That is the nucleus of hydrogen and helium atoms, 
as well as the optical component of gamma radiation 
as observed by Anderson between 1931-1932. 

"At present, however, it is very difficult to doubt 
that the highly absorbable component of the primary 
cosmic-ray beam consists largely of electrons absorbed
principally through the mechanisms discussed above, 
which give rise to the electron showers." 

"Until quite recently it was not clear that the high 
energy positive and negative electrons which have 
now been shown to exhibit a high absorbability 
behaved in a manner essentially differently from 
the cosmic-ray particles of highly penetrating 
character.  These highly penetrating particles, 
although not free positive and negative electrons, 
appear to consist of both positive and negative 
particles of unit electric charge, and will provide 
interesting material for future study." 

Review of the evidence: 

At first, I had reviewed this material with some 
caution, because in Andersons day, the definition 
of all the objects detected in his experiments, had 
not yet been fully agreed upon;  that is Anderson 
refers to all subatomic particles directly detected 
as "electrons" or indirectly as "photons" possibly 
gamma-rays.
 
However, since Anderson had not yet discovered the 
existence of the meson 'which he did do later on' and 
any of the positively charged by-products (that is 
positrons) produced by cosmic-rays ploughing 
through a lead barrier within the Wilson Cloud 
Chamber apparatus were compared to the energies 
associated with what we now recognize to be the 
classic "electron" of the lepton class.

Anderson makes a clear distinction between "free 
positive and negative electrons" and those "highly 
penetrating particles" of a more direct cosmic origin,
to which the free positive and negative electrons 
produced in the cloud chamber were not produced from 
material being knocked out of the barrier itself... 
but were clearly defined as being from a compounded 
cosmic-ray source. 

So it would appear that Carl D. Anderson was the 
first person to directly observe the electronic 
decomposition of the gamma-ray photon as well as 
the electronic decomposition of the nuclei of atoms. 

I must take this moment to explain in full 
why I believe that the mass of the subatomic 
particles is ultimately different than the measured 
laboratory values. Because, within a laboratory 
setting, there are objects which must be reconciled 
with Newtonian mechanics, no matter how small 
the objects become. There are nuclear and atomic 
lattice-works to which all of the probing instruments,
as well as the field-effects devices are fixed... That
this will ultimately have an affect on the 
measurements of these objects.  Regardless of how 
careful or rigorous these problems are addressed, 
is a reality echoed by Werner Heisenberg. 

However, that the Heisenberg Principal of 
Uncertainty is ultimately flawed, of this, there 
is no question.  Since the position or velocity of 
any object must be measured in relation to another 
object of known position or velocity.  And an object 
of any size whatsoever in possession of a relative 
velocity has no relative position.  So the force of 
kinetic energy and effects of inertia must operate 
independently of size.  Therefore, in order for 
gravity to function, it must operate independently 
of the magnitude of the objects. 

That the tenet of Quantum Mechanics states that 
we must live with never knowing for a certainty, 
that realm which is beyond our five senses is not 
acceptable.  I have, therefore, included a reference 
to an effect within formal science which echoes 
Einstein's prediction of the apparent increase in 
mass of an object as it approaches the speed of 
light.  However, this effect 'can' be measured. 

"Mossbauer effect" 

"The emission without recoil of a gamma-ray 
photon from a nucleus embedded in a solid. 
The emission of a gamma ray by a single atom 
in a gas causes the atom to recoil and reduces 
the energy of the gamma ray from its usual 
transition energy E0 to E0-R.  Where R is the 
recoil energy." 
"In 1957 R. L. Mossbauer discovered that if 
the emitting nucleus is held by strong forces 
in the lattice of a solid,the recoil energy is 
shared by all the nucleii in the lattice. 
As there may typically be 10^10-10^20 atoms 
in the lattice the recoil will be negligible and 
the gamma-ray photon has the energy E0. 
The same principle applies to the absorption 
of gamma rays and is used in Mossbauer-effect 
spectroscopy to elucidate problems in nuclear 
physics, solid-state physics, and chemistry." 

One final note:  Since all of the measurements 
in SI are conducted within STP, the amount of 
the atoms in a gas, such as hydrogen becomes 
10^23, after  Avogadro.  Since humanities first 
contact with and subsequent measurements of 
the proton are directly associated with the 
hydrogen molecule.  And what I have found in 
my theory is that many of the constants in SI 
relate directly to the hydrogen atom. 
That is the formula of these constants contain 
the fundamental components particular to the 
hydrogen atom... such as the electronic mass 
unit or its compounded or individual numbers. 
This is very interesting.  

The first set of equations below may only apply
to the emissions energies of a free electron.
Since the emissions of a gamma ray or radiation 
in the optical spectrum operate under a more
complex set of circumstances.  

If we take the average charge of the electron
out to five places of decimal and divide by
the average volt of an electron out to two places
of decimal, we get "pi" out to five places. 

IF: 1.6022 /.51 = 3.141568627 = pi approx. 

I probably should not have included the following
set of equations as part of my formal treatise, 
because these represent a basis of electronic
theory in terms of yield that I cannot validate or
may not be justified in it's current form.  I will
calculate further and probably change this 
posting at some date in the near future.

However, the geometric relationship is most 
certainly valid, and anyone that cares to find
alternate formula or proofs, may find this path
more than a little interesting.  
 
WHERE: 1.602187159 = electronic charge 

THEN: 1.602187159 /pi = .5099920122 
>> = MeV - R MeV  energy of the electron less
the recoil energy.

IF: 1.602187159 /pi + 1 /996.1582 = MeV
>> = .5109958688 electron emissions energy 

THEN: 1/996.1582 = .001003856616 MeV
>> = R MeV electron recoil energy 

IF: 1.602187159^2 /pi + 1.602187159 /996.1582
>> = 8.187110194  mc^2 = E

Since the emission of a gamma ray photon 
occurs without recoil in an atomic lattice or solid, 
and according to my optical emissions theory, 
the light photon is accompanied by a non-optical 
component or filament of alternating positive and 
negative electrons; pushing or pumping light out 
of the atom.  The only time a "gas atom" should 
experience "recoil" in association with light is 
upon absorption of the optical component.

Because when gas atoms emit light they do so
under the stimulus of an external electromagnetic
source.  For example:  A neon light bulb, or an 
incandescent light filament...  or even the lasing
media of a population inversion.  

AND: 2 * 1.602187159 /pi + 2 /996.1582 
>> = 1.021991738 MeV = EO gamma ray

AND; 2 * 1.602187159 /pi 
>> = 1.019984024 MeV = EO - R gamma ray

THEN: 2 /996.1582 = .002007713233 MeV = R 
>> = recoil energy gamma ray photon

The last set of equations above may, therefore, only
apply to the absorption of a gamma ray by a gas
atom.

2^(1/2) * 2 * 1.602187159 * 2.99792458^2 /
6.626045764 * (1.602187159 /pi + 1.106551/1000)
= pi
 
Signed:  Brian S. McMillan  

Visit: www.godkings.com