ON THE NATURE OF GRAVITY
				by Brian S. McMillan

	It is the intention of this author to show that gravity can be divided 
into two codependent categories:  I. Inertia.  II. Magnetism.  Where in the 
one form of inertia, planetary Gravity One is not a fundamental force.  But 
rather a consequence of kinetic energy as it may relate to planetary bodies 
set in motion about a central member such as the sun.  And, through their 
connection to the sun, by strings of magnetic filaments, acting as the second 
category of Gravity Two.  Which is in this sense also not a force, but is a 
quasi-rigid structure, composed of alternating positive and negative 
electrons, forming a cable or rope of pulley belts, which act as a type of 
tether to the sun for all of the planets and minor bodies of the solar system.  
And through this structure, the earth is caused to rotate by means of these 
pulley belts, which momentum is imparted through the suns rotation.  
	Since a mechanical device, such as physical material or a structure 
devised by nature and acting as an armature is required in the creation of 
angular momentum.  And perpetual motion cannot exist.  A very slight drag 
results through mechanical friction, resulting in a very small rate of slowing 
down of the orbital velocity and rotation of the earth and creating a 
centripetal effect, which we experience as gravity;  from the falling of an 
apple to the falling of rain.  In actuality, when we see a rock fall, the rock is 
not actually falling... it is the Earth which is moving into the rock.  Since our 
bodies are already stuck to the ground, we do not experience this motion as 
falling, we experience this motion as Gravity One.  Because everything else 
is also grounded, we believe that the Earth Reference Frame is stationary... 
when in reality we are hurtling through space on a spinning ball.  

Johannes Kepler was the first person to describe this system of universal 
gravitation, and gave it the name of "anima motrix".  
This is without a doubt, the mechanism which is responsible for holding all 
of the planets in their respective orbits about the sun.  

	Picture yourself driving in your car.  Someone stops suddenly in front 
of you!  You put on the brakes... what happens?  You feel yourself being 
thrown forward as the car stops rather abruptly and friction results from the 
brake shoe as it is applied to the brake drum.  Once you and the automobile 
are both stationary.  You no longer feel being thrown forward.  
	Next, you are entering the freeway on-ramp.  The on-ramp is a short 
one, so you press down on the accelerator pedal to reach freeway merging 
speed... what happens?  You feel yourself being pulled back into the seat.  
Once your automobile is no longer accelerating, then you and the car are 
traveling at the same velocity.  And you no longer feel being pressed into 
your seat.  
	These two examples are the result of constant acceleration and 
deceleration in a linear direction.  We will call this the "linear moment of 
inertia".  

	In this next model, you are at an amusement park.  You buy a ticket to 
ride what looks like a ferris wheel lying on its side, kind of like a wheel cage 
with a bunch of standing room, inward facing compartments with harnesses 
on the inside diameter of the wheel rim.  You are directed to enter from the 
inside.  And once you are in place, you notice at least one other person on 
the far side, standing directly opposite yourself for balance.  The wheel 
begins to rotate slowly, and then spinning faster and faster, you feel yourself 
being pressed into the back of your compartment in the same way as you 
experienced when you pressed on the accelerator pedal in your car.  An air-
jack mounted underneath the ride and connected to an armature, then slowly 
lifts and rotates the entire wheel up at an angle, so that while you are farthest 
away from the ground, you are looking down at an angle;  and, rather 
frightened at this point, you are not falling out of your compartment.  
	This example is the result of rotational acceleration to a constant 
velocity in an orbital or circular mode.  We will call this the "angular 
moment of inertia" or angular momentum.  

	In the mid to late decade of the 1960's, the author was reading a book, 
which described what would happen if a bucket of water were to be attached 
and tethered to a rope.  And then rotated about a common center by a 
participant, while holding on to the rope in the middle of the circle.  So, I 
had to try this for myself.  Sure enough!  The surface of the water in the 
bucket, took on nearly the same orientation to the bottom of the bucket;  that 
is almost parallel to the bucket rim.  And of course, without spilling out!  
	This model was consistent with a model for artificial gravity, 
illustrated by a 1950's artist, for a rendition of an earth orbiting space station, 
to be based upon the same "centrifugal" mechanism;  creating an "angular 
moment of Inertia".  
	Sometime during the decade of the 1970's, the author saw a 
representation of Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, concerning 
the equivalence of inertial reference frames with those of planetary gravity.  
The first illustration in the book showed an astronaut standing on a lunar 
landing module 'platform' resting on an out-of-scale representation of the 
earth's moon, with a rocket report mounted underneath and in the center of 
the four landing legs.  This image represented planetary gravity.  
	The second illustration showed the module above and rotated ninety 
degrees with respect to the moon.  With the rocket report activated and the 
corresponding astronaut standing or 'stuck' against the platform... and 
perpendicular to the rotated platform floor as would be experienced in the 
planetary model.  This image represented the equivalence of an accelerated 
reference frame, to that of planetary gravity as in the first model.  

	Now these observations might seem rather boring and academic at 
this point.  If it were not for one interesting fact.  Due to the linear accelerated 
reference frame, represented in Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.  The 
"moment of inertia" is mechanically different from the resulting change in 
momentum brought about in the centrifugal model... of which no distinction 
or clarification is made.  It was on this single point... that of a linear, 
accelerated frame of reference, which distinguished the General Theory 
from that of the Special Theory of Relativity.  

	For example, in the second illustration, the body of the astronaut can 
only remain 'stuck' to the module platform, if the acceleration of the module 
is constant.  This would result in an exponential rate of fuel expenditure.  
	Conversely, in the centrifugal model, the constant rotation of a 
massive body, resulting in that bodies angular momentum... in this case, 
that of the bucket of water, results in the water remaining nestled in the 
bottom of the container.  With the rate of fuel loss remaining constant to the 
combined masses of the container and its contents, and in relation to the 
length and mass of the tether with that of the mass of the central body.  
And in the case of a person holding a rope, attached to an object, while 
spinning in a circle and standing on terra firma... a more grounded central 
mass.  

	There arises from these observations that the traditional Newtonian 
laws of motion are applicable to all objects, which are of a greater 
dimensional magnitude, than that of our more immediate earth centered 
environment.  In other words, the physical kinetic laws governing the 
motion of any or all massive bodies, which participate in any given 
interaction, are independent of the scale of the objects.  So size doesn't 
matter.  Since the neutrino has been verified to possess mass.  This would, 
therefore, include the very tiny realm of the quantum world.  And the 
physical table of fundamental constants in International Standard Units, 
does recognize the "quantum of angular momentum"... even if for the 
wrong reason.  
	Because our earth is rotating on its axis.  And it also orbits the sun.  
And in turn, our solar system is rotating about the center of the Milky Way 
galaxy... do we feel it?  And if we do... how do we feel it?  If you don't think 
that you feel it... think again.  You may not be aware that you are feeling it.  
Just like your own skin.  Your used to feeling it by now.  Unless the laws 
of motion do not apply outside of the immediate earth reference laboratory 
frame... and we know that they do.  Since Alan Shepard hit a golf ball on 
the moon.  And Sir Isaac Newton not only took us to the moon... but to 
mars as well.  
	One last point... and this is crucial.  Since gravity is an effect... not 
a force.  In the vacuum of gravity free space, the constant rotation of an 
open wheel about its major axis alone, is not sufficient to create the effect 
of gravity upon the smooth surface of the inside rim.  It will not pull a body 
toward the inside surface.  Unless an intermediary vehicle or structure, 
such as a molecular atmosphere or a magnetic field of a certain density 
is, through kinetic pressure, aiding in some form of connection with that 
moving surface through turbulence or collision.  
	In the specific case of "angular momentum" alone, a second angular 
moment is required.  And this likened to the rotation of a small wheel set 
in orbital motion about a larger body or wheel of rotation.  In which the 
larger, more massive wheel or central body, as the case may be, must be 
physically connected to the smaller orbiting wheel or body of rotation, 
through a system of spokes, a quasi-rigid tether... or as in the case of the 
earth and the sun, through a belted pulley of magnetic lines of flux.  It is 
assumed in this case, that the mass of the tether is proportionally less per 
unit dimension, as measured against the diameter of the bodies in the 
universal model of gravitation.  
	
	THIS IS GRAVITY!  

				Copyright 1983-2003 Brian S. McMillan  


	The following excerpt, copied from the original text in a book written 
by Albert Einstein, titled "OUT OF MY LATER YEARS", reveals the difficulty, 
even for the great scientific mind, in making a distinction between cause 
and effect... as this might be applied to the experience of planetary gravity.  

	"Classical mechanics contains one point which is unsatisfactory in 
that, in the fundamentals, the same mass constant is met twice over in 
two different roles, namely as "inertial mass" in the law of motion, and as 
"gravitational mass" in the law of gravitation.  As a result of this, the 
acceleration of a body in a pure gravitational field is independent of its 
material; or, in a coordinate system of uniform acceleration (accelerated 
in relation to an "inertial system") the motions take place as they would in 
a homogeneous gravitational field (in relation to a motionless system of 
coordinates).  If one assumes that the equivalence of these two cases is 
complete, then one attains an adaptation of our theoretical thinking to the 
fact that the gravitational and inertial masses are identical."  
	"From this it follows that there is no longer any reason for favoring, 
as a fundamental principal, the "inertial systems"; and we must admit as 
equivalent in their own right, also non-linear transformations of the 
coordinates (x1, x2 ,x3 ,x4)."  

	The brilliant reasoning capacity of Albert Einstein brought forth the 
understanding that gravitational and inertial masses are identical.  While 
at the same time singling out the gravitational reference frame as a 
"motionless system of coordinates".  Einstein could not help but favor the 
notion that planetary gravity was a fundamental force.  When in reality... 
planetary gravity is an effect of angular momentum; in part... summed up 
as an experience by the combined rotation of the earth upon its own axis 
of rotation and its orbital velocity about the sun.  And this... made possible 
only through a connection to the sun by filaments or strings of magnetism 
in the form of pulley belts.  The later mechanism, of which was first 
described by Johannes Kepler as the "Anima Motrix".  Kepler, included 
both the magnetic and the inertial portions to describe his model of 
universal gravitation.  
	Einstein tried to explain gravity as a single universal force from the 
viewpoint of mathematical and descriptive laws, when really, the nature of 
gravity is a compound of two totally separate effects, intimately relating the 
force of kinetic energy to inertia and acting through material magnetic 
fields composed of electrical masses of coherent electricity.  
	For example:  When an object or lesser celestial body which is not 
a more permanent, evolutionary fixture of a particular planetary or stellar 
system (that is a member which has not accreted from stellar material and 
become connected to the central star through the electromagnetic 
"pulley belts"), moves into the "sphere of influence" of a larger, more 
permanent planetary member;  the first "gravitational effect" is signaled 
between the lesser object and the planet, through "electromagnetic means".
That is "NOT" through some "inherent attraction" shared by the bodies 
through or because of their "Physical Mass" alone.  
	In the case of a displaced asteroid moving near the earth, the 
earth's "geomagnetic field" is going to come into contact with the asteroid 
first.  And if the asteroid is moving slow enough, and the timed approach of 
the asteroid is subtle enough, the ionosphere and molecular atmosphere 
of the earth will continue to draw the asteroid into its "inertial reference 
frame" by "pulling" the object along with it and "dragging" it to the ground... 
All through a combined effect of the earth's angular moment of inertia, 
along with the material friction of the geomagnetic field and aided by the 
molecular atmosphere, which the earth's geomagnetic field is also 
suspending or helping to hold in its place.  
	So there is no such thing as a truly motionless system of coordinates.  
Since in the universe, everything is in constant motion with certain material 
objects sharing in a particular frame of reference, which may ultimately be 
perceived by the human mind as stationary.  While objects on earth may be 
"relatively" stationary within the "earth reference laboratory frame".  The 
earth is revolving upon its own axis of rotation and at the same moment is 
in orbit about the sun, etc...  The independent bodies of material cannot be 
distinguished from the force of contact.  There is no way to clearly isolate 
motion as energy from the objects as a vehicle of that motion.  In nature, 
there are many systems of material reference... that is, many bodies.  In an 
infinite universe there can be no ideal, "single body system".  While there 
can be a single, fundamental unit of matter.  There is more than one unit of 
this material.  There is only one true force in the universe... and thus be 
"kinetic".  

				Except quotes:
				Copyright 1983-2003 Brian S. McMillan  

Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation 
IF: F = G m*m/r^2 
WHERE: F = Newtons 

Coulomb's Law 
IF: F = k q*q/r^2 
WHERE: F = Newtons 

THEN: G m*m/r^2 = k q*q/r^2 

SO: G = k q*q/(m*m) 

HENCE: G = k q^2/m^2 
___________________________  

IF: F = mg 

THEN: mg = k q^2/r^2 

HENCE: g = k/m * q^2/r^2 
___________________________  

FINALLY: G = g r^2/m 

OR: g = Gm/r^2  

___________________________ 

We may also write this with 'M' and 'm' as the "greater" and "lesser" bodies, 
however, for now we will treat the objects as having identical masses.  
___________________________ 

If Newton incorporates 'G' into 'F' by treating them as separate quantities.  
Then how can 'Force' equal 'Gravity'.  

At no time do we see 'F' = 'G'  

Rather, it will always be F/G = X 
or G/F = 1/X  

At no time do we see 'F' = 'g' for that matter!  
___________________________  

Since Coulomb's Law is readily incorporated into Newton's Law of Gravitation.  
And since the law of gravitational acceleration or 'g' is also incorporated into 
Newton's Law of Gravitation.  

Then: We must be left with only one conclusion!  

This is that Newton's Law of Gravitation must include both the Inertial or 
accelerated (mass) 'g' and Electromagnetic components of gravity 'q^2'; that is 
Gravity I and II to describe the "kinetic force" between objects.  
And, that the constant 'G' is treated as a value which is only related to the 
force 'F' between objects.  Without regard to the more popular retrospective 
definition of nomenclature that science wishes to envision as Newton's Law of 
Universal Gravitation.  That is, while we wish to define gravity as a "force"... 
Newton's treatment of gravity in his equations, again place the "force" 'F' as a 
wholly separate value than the definition of the constant 'G' which we attach to 
it.  That is not to say that 'G' is Gravity... it is only a constant... however, 
Einstein stated that the "same" constant is met twice over... that is 'g' and 'G'.  
And obviously, their NOT the same.  Because g = Gm/r^2...  

Obviously, if we consider that Newton conceived of this law of interaction with 
the planetary and interplanetary considerations in mind.  And since the 
"geomagnetic field" of earth is a physical reality in both cases.  Furthermore, 
since the magnetic component conceived of by Kepler as operating between 
stars and planets is actually composed of strings or filaments of alternating 
positive and negative electrons (common magnetism); which is coincidentally 
the same law of interaction between atoms or molecules as described by 
Coulomb; and which is also easily translated into Newtons.  
Then again... we are left with the same conclusion as stated above.  And that is, 
that mathematically Newton's Law works!  Furthermore, it would appear that 
Newton's intention, while not knowingly including the electromagnetic aspect 
of interaction in his theory... he did so, never the less, through the definition 
of the objects.  And because of this Coulomb was able to easily translate this in 
his formula.  And this is precisely why it works.  

	In 1983, the author created a model for the connection of the planets to 
the sun... specifically the earth to the sun; where through the use of two plastic 
pulley's and a very large rubber band combined with the use of a square hollow 
plastic girder and a Japanese micro-motor, that I purchased at a model shop, 
I went to work trying to create a mechanism that would duplicate the mechanical 
behaviors of the planets in relation to the sun.  I realize that this must sound 
rather trivial, but at the time I was very head strong about the matter.  This is 
because in the preceding couple of years I had seen several "first discovery" 
photographs in a book that I purchased titled "Beyond Vision" by Jon Darius.  

	The first photograph that struck me was on P. 150, titled 
"Pursuit of Corona".  It was explained that in this image, an occulting disk was 
used to further block out the sun's ray's during a total solar eclipse and using 
several different exposures for the final image a fantastic picture was created... 
the "coronal streamers" that emanated from the sun were rope-like and almost 
solid looking... and appeared to possess some sort of configuration... 
IN A VACUUM?  
	That the streamers appeared to dissipate into a 'spray' gave me a clue, 
because I knew that ionizing radiation leaving the sun had to be illuminating 
something that was otherwise not visible... but what?  Upon close examination 
of the streamers I saw that their linear strands appeared to cross near the sun, 
before traveling away in all directions and finally fanning out and diminishing.  
Looking like a stream of water from a garden hose as it turns into a mist while 
hitting a bamboo pole stuck in the ground.  I thought they had to go 
somewhere... but where?  The answer came from another photograph in the 
book.  
	The second photograph was on P. 217, titled "Puck's Girdle".  In this image 
the north pole of earth is made visible in ultra-violet light to reveal the 
"Auroral Oval" which is where the earth's geomagnetic field curls into the upper 
atmosphere above the poles and is consequently the primary target for the 
solar wind; creating the northern lights.  For Puck's Girdle; as "two bright spots 
stand out at the positions of noon and midnight" while this same feature is 
duplicated at the south pole.  This is where the "Coronal Streamers" that were 
leaving the sun were going... to those TWO BRIGHT SPOTS!  

I thought, OH MY GOD... IT'S GRAVITY!!!  Ok now... what is IT?  MAGNETISM... 
what else!  Another page in the book showed a polar satellite image of venus, 
this time in infrared.  With two bright spots and a faint blue girdle... the same 
features as in the "Puck's Girdle" image above the earth.  In the late ninety's I 
was looking at Hubble Space Telescope images of Jupiter and Saturn in a book 
at the library.  These same features could be seen at the poles.  This was more 
than I ever needed to know.  But I had to see it anyway.  Even though I knew it 
would be there.  

	In my plastic pulley belt rubber band model (I had arbitrarily attached 
the drive to the orbiting earth pulley and caused the earth to rotate about the 
sun by hand)... when I made the rubber band cross with a single twist 
between pulley's as in a figure eight or infinity symbol, and the micro motor 
was running... the outer pulley representing the earth would easily counter 
rotate on it's own axis, that is opposite to the sun's rotation while orbiting in 
the same direction as that of the sun's rotation and almost symbiotically 
helping the sun to rotate... something like a fly wheel arrangement.  When I 
made the rubber band like a bicycle chain, without a figure eight or twist, 
the earth would stall in it's rotation upon it's own axis and present the same 
face toward the sun while it was orbiting... JUST LIKE THE EARTH'S MOON!  
WOW! WOW! WOW!  

	Four years before this; in 1979, I proposed that magnetic lines of flux 
or filaments of magnetism were actually composed of positive and negative 
electrons; like alternating black and white pearls on a pearl necklace; I think 
Faraday had already done something like this with atoms, except in a lattice 
gear configuration.  It wasn't until 1992, while reviewing an article for the 
umpteenth time in a Scientific American Magazine titled "The Reality of The 
Quantum World" by Abner Shimony... that my big break happened.  The 
conclusion that I came to concerning the delicate correlations between 
separated light photons in the EPR format experiment was this; THE LIGHT 
QUANTA HAD TO BE CONNECTED!  But by what?  MAGNETISM... OF COURSE!  
AGAIN, WHAT ELSE?  Since magnetism is really STRINGS of interconnected
ELECTRONS (electrons have a structure too), and light can be defined as
 having two functionally configured parts which are, in origin, mechanically 
identical; that is the "optical part" and the "non-optical part" in relation to 
the atom of emission... and all of these parts including the atom are 
composed of positive and negative electrons.  Then every stellar source or 
solar body in the universe that emits light, does so with little photo-electronic 
optical fly casting reels as their natural mechanism or mode of propagation.  
THIS IS HOW A SOLAR SYSTEM BEGINS IT'S OWN GRAVITATIONAL FRAMEWORK.  
THIS IS HOW AND WHY BLACK HOLES FORM AND WHY GALAXY FORM AROUND 
THEM AND BECOME CONNECTED TO EACH OTHER; like thread through a 
button hole and connected to the next button etc...  

	Since Jupiter has the greatest mass of any of the other planets and is 
considered the shepherd of the solar system... it's pulley belts are going to 
have the greatest effect in bulk as well as volume.  This is because the number 
of magnetic strands that hold it to the sun at any one moment will also be 
the greatest of all the other planets.  Consequently, the number of times that 
Jupiter's magnetic filaments curl around the solar core will also be the greatest.  
The result of this, is that all of the other planets pulley belts, are going to be 
affected by Jupiter's "Great Pull" along with it's orbital position.  For example:  
During "Solar Minimum" when sun spot activity has completely disappeared.  
The position of Jupiter in it's orbit should be just passing aphelion; that is just 
passing the elongated peak of it's ellipse or farthest distance in it's orbit around 
the sun.  The reason I say this, is that when Jupiter is approaching perihelion or 
the narrowest position and subsequently it's closest fly-by to the sun.  It's 
pulley belts which are coiled around the core of the sun are no longer "tugging" 
with the pull that they were exerting while approaching aphelion and now the 
"slack" emerges as frayed and dissipated fibers at the north and south solar 
poles, which begin to braid or weave into a rope like cable appearing as 
"Sun Spots", which magnetic filaments in turn begins to arc from the southern 
to the northern hemisphere of the solar surface.  
	As Jupiter again, passes perihelion or it's narrowest position in it's elliptical 
orbit and approaches aphelion, it begins to "tug" again on it's pulley belts and in 
doing so exert force by pulling on the other, "less massive" planetary belts at the 
solar core;  while the entire group of "Sun Spots" begin their great march toward 
the solar equator.  What the "spots" are really doing, is a reflection of the 
magnetic pulley belts as they begin to migrate toward the solar core and finally 
"Plunging" into the solar surface at the equator in their mad dash to once more 
reach their tightest coil around the core density boundary of the sun... kind of 
like a cheese cutting wire as it's loop begins disappearing into the cheese.  
	Because the magnetic pulley belts are moving in and out of the solar 
surface we will see a fluid plasma like drawing out of "negative polarity" or 
positive surface distortion around the "Spots"... like a spoon being pulled from 
a bowl of cookie dough.  And it's opposite appearance will be where the solar 
plasma is dipping into the sun's surface or "positive polarity" movement of the 
field lines inward toward the solar core.  The dark areas in the spots while 
representing a cooler region is also a window into the solar interior.  
	As the solar plasma flares upward from the negative polarity side of the 
magnetic field coming out of the sun spot, it arcs across to the positive polarity 
or surface descending portion of the belt.  And because of the material mass 
and momentum of the plasma (if it does not draw back to the solar surface), 
begins it's journey across space while aided by the suns (southern hemisphere) 
out going pulley belts connecting it to the Earth; whereby the solar wind is 
accelerated by these magnetic field lines to eventually bombard the earth's 
northern pole as the wind's of "Solar Maximum" hit our home.  
	Next, the pulley belts plunge into the north pole at the day side of high 
noon and move inward toward the earth's center while coiling in at an angled 
motion around it and completing the figure eight while grinding past the core, 
creating friction and heating our interior... whereby they emerge from the 
south pole on the midnight side of the auroral oval rim and arc upward in a 
helical sweep, pealing off and becoming part the earths layered geomagnetic 
field, while the majority of these field lines remain clustered in their outer 
approach toward the north pole as they plunge into the midnight side of the 
northern auroral oval's rim and do the core coil dance one more time before 
again re-emerging at the day side of the auroral oval rim of the south pole 
of earth and begin their journey back to the region of the north solar pole.  
Doing this again and again.  It should be mentioned at this point that because 
light has in it's wake electronic filaments of magnetic field lines, that THE 
SUN IS CONTINUOUSLY PUMPING OUT OVER-SAMPLED MAGNETIC LINE 
REINFORCEMENTS FOR IT'S GRAVITATIONAL MECHANISM TO ALL OF IT'S 
SYSTEM MEMBERS... this will occur until the death or super nova of the star.  
It should finally be noted that even though the Sun's spots are not always 
visible from Earth and not always in the form of larger braided cable windows, 
except at solar maximum... the filaments are always being formed through 
the process of nuclear emissions as well as emerging from around the solar 
core in a broad area of surface distribution according to the cellular matrix 
of much smaller solar spot's or cells.  This is most notable and also the least 
visible at "Solar Minimum".  
	These vibrating and moving magnetic field lines will work in connection 
with chemical reactions to direct all biological processes, including cellular 
mitosis as well as the formation of blood cells in every living creature.  
	The precession of the perihelion of Mercury can be completely resolved 
by this natural mechanism.  In function as well as description.   

	Next, the formation of "Black Hole" and "Galaxy" through the Gravity II 
Standing Radio Emissions Network.  

	The greatest fight that a warrior will ever face... is the battle over 
ignorance. 

	Thank You!
	Signed, 
	Brian S. McMillan, Copyright 1979-2003