Megalithic Architecture and Egyptian Building Techniques + 
Egyptian Tomb Records of Buddhism and the Land of Punt + 
King David and Solomon's Mines + Hyksos-Kassites The 
Himalayan Connection  
by Brian S. McMillan   


The tomb wall of King Thutmosis III brings us a wealth of 
visual information.  The Imi-duat texts represented on the 
interior of the burial chamber appear to show many historical 
facts secret to the ruling class and the priests.  Three such 
images that I have noticed;  two of which appear to show the 
same event in close proximity on the wall, seem to represent 
the 'Eye's of Buddha' found on the stupas of the Kathmandu 
Valley with the all seeing eye of Ra or 'Third Eye' center as well 
as a 'Stupa', or the Lords Chariot with the umbrella-antenna 
in a style almost exclusive to the Chaitya halls at Bhaja, Karle 
and Ajanta in the northern region of India.  These come from 
the Shunga and early Andhra periods respectively and appear 
to mirror the style of the Great Stupa at Sanchi India.  If this is 
true then it would indicate that Buddhism and in turn these 
particular archaeological sites are much older than previously 
suspected.  The third image of particular interest illustrated 
on the wall of the Thutmosis III burial tomb, shows stone blocks 
being floated on barges up what appear to be canals separated 
by locks.  This must be how the Ancient Egyptians used the 
hydraulic pump of the Great Pyramids to move water up out of 
the bedrock of the Giza Plateau to be channeled down through 
these locks and finally moving the barges up the lock steps of 
the pyramids themselves in order to move the monoliths to their 
final positions.  While I found this last image in a much older 
book published in 1971 titled, "Secrets Of The Great Pyramid" 
by Peter Tompkins on page 258 (also note the top picture 
p. 258, showing the hydraulic technique), without the tomb of 
origin, a more recent and descriptive printing of the image may 
be seen on page 235 fig. 139, in a book titled "Egyptian Art" 
by Malek, Jaromir / 1999.  Note: James Churchward stated that 
the unadorned serpent has always been the symbol for water... 
(He was right).  Furthermore, in 1994 while excavating a site for 
a hotel in Cairo Egypt, just such canal-locks were discovered 
leading from the Nile in the direction of the Great Pyramids on 
the Giza Plateau.  (see URL click-on's below)  The use of water 
as a buoyant vehicle was deliberately pumped up through the 
connecting well from the drain in the subterranean pit; the 
lowest chamber far below the center of the pyramid, by the use 
of plunging stones down the ascending and descending passages 
of which were lined with hard granite for constant and repeated 
use.  In the case of the Khufu-Cheops Pyramid, the Grand Gallery 
\was obviously a modified invention of the hydraulic process 
which was to facilitate a long standing technique utilized 
throughout all historic periods where pyramids were constructed 
in Egypt.  I say this because most if not all of the pyramids in 
Egypt were accompanied by the construction of a descending 
passage and connecting well.  The use of the Portcullis of the 
"Triple Veil" located at the position of the Kings Antechamber 
was to act as a type of block and tackle in the pulling of ropes 
attached to the rigging within the Grand Gallery and gain leverage 
to pull the plunging stone or "Enclosed Vessel" against the slope 
of gravity and up the ascending passage and possibly to push 
the heavy wheel tied to the connecting arm of that chamber 
against the hydraulic pressure needed to force water up the 
connecting well.  This is why the notches in the walls of the 
portcullis are heavily worn even though they are of hard granite, 
because of the repeated movement of the heavy stone blocks 
acting as a counterbalance.  The early use of the Egyptian obelisk 
as a counter balance beam was not only employed to place the 
facing stones on the pyramid but was also utilized throughout 
later periods in the construction of pylon retaining walls acting 
as water reservoirs, where smaller chambers could be filled 
with water from the pylon reservoirs and thereby lifting the 
monolithic stone blocks up on to their supports.  These pylon 
reservoirs which were constructed first in front of the proposed 
monument by using the obelisk.  This is why these monuments 
all have obelisk positions in front of the pylon entry walls and 
also would explain why the pylons themselves appear to be so 
proportionately tall and slim walled in comparison with the 
rest of the temple proper.  The temples at Luxor and Karnak 
as well as the temple of Horus at Edfu are but three of the many 
proposed examples of the application of this hydraulic technique.  
Coincidentally, a similar employment of this technique through 
the use of reservoir retaining walls was used by the Ancient 
Cambodians in Judah to build the Solomon Temple-Angkor Wat, 
as well as the other megalithic stone architecture of the region.  
This is why all of the monuments of Angkor have a moat or canal 
running in close proximity to the construction sites.  This would 
be a consistent and reasonable proposal, since the peoples 
inhabiting Ancient Cambodia are really the descendants of the 
Tribe of Judah which came up out of Egypt with Aaron and 
Buddha-Moses.  A similar use of hydraulics may have also 
been employed in the construction of Sachsaywaman in Peru.   

There is also common reference to Angkor as being the heart 
of the Khmer Empire; when in reality the word Khmer was taken 
from the longest standing and most durable stone structures 
in Kambu-Judesa... the temples.  Where these temples were 
maintained by the priest class mentioned in Zep 1: 4 of the 
Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures as the "Chemarims".  
Oddly enough, ancient historical reference to to the 
'Cimmerian Hoards' may refer to the Siam-Simeonites or even 
the priestly class of warriors in the same way that KURU is 
synonymous with GURU in India and Tibet.  In addition to 
Angkor Wat being the House that Solomon built.  
King Solomon's Mines should more correctly be called 
King David's Mines.  Since King David's real title is spelled 
King Udayadityavarman, and there is a statue on the Island 
of Sumatra to commemorate him.  The City of Palembang 
is near the ancient gold mines of Ophir as listed in the 
Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures.  These gold mines 
were originally controlled by the Srivijaya Empire and taken 
over by King David-Udayadityavarman, where the gold was 
taken from Jambi down river or accross an ancient canal-join 
with the Musi River or to the mouth just below Malayasia and 
back up the Musi River to Palembang to await shipment to 
the mouth of the Mekong Delta and then up to Angkor.  
I surmise that the reason for this was to prevent anyone 
not directly connected to the mine from knowing it's exact 
location.  Quoting, 1 Samuel 3: 2, "Sons were born to David 
in Hebron:  His firstborn was Amnon the son of Ahinoam of 
Jezreel;".  Coincidentally, according to Wikipedia's Srivijaya 
web page, a crown prince by the name of Anan-ggavarman 
was the son of Adityawarman or more correctly 
Uday-adityavarman, with what in my personal opinion is a 
completely incorrect date.  This would not be too difficult 
to imagine, since the entire historical period for the so called 
Khmer Empire actually covers a date that reaches their 
zenith of power at least 2200 years previous to the 1200 AD 
designation which is currently accepted by historians.  This 
is where it becomes difficult to separate the actual descendants 
of historical personages from legend.  This is because of the 
displacement of war!  As the historical records begin to become 
more fragmented and sporadic.  At this point we must turn to 
the actual cultural records of the respective countries in order 
to fill in the gaps through record reconstruction along with 
careful but modest biblical comparison.   

The c. 1400 tomb wall of Sennefer in Western Thebes also 
illustrates the Eyes of Re with the Third Eye present and 
Sennefer is holding the Divine Lotus in a manner of Southeast 
Asian Art particular to statues of Manjushri-Manjush Re.   

With ancient Put I or Punt I, being located in the Indus Valley 
Civilization's Punjab of Northwestern India.  One of he first stops 
or ports in maritime trading between Egypt and the Shrivijaya 
Empire from the period of about 3000 BC to 2200 BC was 
near the mouth of the ancient Indus, but some evidence 
exists to indicate that the Southern tip of India to Orissa-Osiris 
or Konarak-Karnak was also used after Joseph-Hor Aha 
c. 3000 BC, and into the New Kingdom.  So when the Egyptians 
stated that they were going to Punt, it became standard to 
refer to one of their first stops along the way as the peoples 
of the Punjab.  Since the decline of the Indus Valley Civilization 
at the hands of Aaron-Arayan and the Israelites around 2200 BC, 
and after about 1900 BC, it would appear that the major trade 
routes and trading partnership shifted to the Karle-Bhaja group 
at Mumbai, India or Punt II;  which not too long after that also 
included the Ellora and Ajanta Cave Group's.  The reason that 
I say this is because, several works of rock cut art as well as 
paintings from these caves appear to mirror those of the Great 
Srivijaya Empire on Java, Sumatra and Bali, making these Ancient 
Indonesian Kingdoms major trading partners with Middle and 
New Kingdom Egypt via Western India.  At least one image of 
the tree of life containing human headed Ba Birds found at 
Prambanan is also found in the tomb of Panehsy and his Wife 
in Egypt, and as mentioned above the elongated stupa style 
from Karle is also found illustrated on the tomb wall of 
Thutmosis III, the successor of Hatshepsut.  When pigmies 
were brought into Egypt from Punt, the pigmy probably 
originated on the Island of Flores East of Bali.  Other artifacts 
found in Ancient Egypt claimed to have originated from Punt, 
include an inscribed bone boomerang which is thought to be 
exclusive of the aboriginal peoples of the Australo-Polynesian 
group.  Furthermore, during the Egyptian New Kingdom period 
during the reign of Hatshepsut, relief panels showing raised 
living quarters or huts on stilts associated with the Land of Punt 
would indicate that Egyptian maritime traders actually sailed to 
the Indonesian Archipelago where these type of huts were in 
common use.  The Hatshepsut era panels also show the wife 
of the ruler of Punt as having heavy folds of skin and fat which 
is likewise also shown in relief panels on one of the Indonesian 
Islands or at Prambanan on the island of Java-Joppa.  These 
same panels also show her wearing bangle arm and leg bracelets, 
identical with the Ancient Indus Valley tradition.  The hair style 
(shown on the Hatshepsut reliefs) with ribbon tied at the back 
of the head of the accompaning retinue to the royal party is 
likewise identicle with that of the so-called "Priest King" of 
Mohenjo-daro.  In a book titled "The Seventy Great Mysteries 
of Ancient Egypt" edited by Bill Manley, Copyright Thames & 
Hudson Ltd, London, p. 174, states in the left hand margin:  
"Right; The chief of Punt, Parehu, and his obese wife, from the 
scenes in Hatshepsut's temple at Deir el-Bahri".  The use of 
the name "Parehu" is again, employment of the ancient Hebrew 
word "parah" which is what the name of Ephraim is based upon, 
the name of Pot-phera priest of On-Oni is based upon, and also 
what the Egyptian title for Pharoah is based.  So this would 
indicate that the use of this term in ancient Egyptian records 
is not the persons name, but their title... Pharoah or God King 
of a rich land.  The use of the prefix 'Para' in ancient Indian-Hindu 
tradition, is many times used in reference to 'rich life', 'kingly', or 
even within a 'royal' context; as many examples exist within the
 Joseph-Vishnu Purana, one of the oldest of the Purana's.  Also, 
the Provence of Gujarat or "Gujjaratta" in India, may be recorded 
in Egyptian texts as Ta-Netjer, not only for it's association with 
the 'Land of God' but also for what the Egyptians designated for 
its proper name as the "region of Utjenet" near Punt.  I have to 
surmise that the district or city of Patan, within the Provence of 
Gujarat, as well as the city of Patan in Nepal may be related to 
the Ancient Hebrew name Padan as in Padan-aram as these are 
mentioned in connection with the same Biblical region of 
Mahanaim as is to Mahayana in Ancient Sanskrit.  Since it may 
be argued that Mahanaim is a region mentioned in the Old 
Testament of the Holy Scriptures, while Mahayana is a Buddhist 
School... schools are seen as regions as well as people and 
vise-versa.  It should be finally noted that the remnants of stilt 
holes near a river in Northern India along with gray-ware shards 
would indicate that huts were also raised off the ground in and 
around these areas.  One final interesting note:  The region of 
Yam listed in ancient Egyptian records, was often used as the 
name of a place near or synonymous with Punt.  I wonder if 
reference to Yam meant Yamuna, as in the Yamuna River region 
near the source of the Indus as well as the Ganges-Jordan Rivers.  
While the Kingdom of Yemen or Jemen 'may be' listed as Tjemeh 
in ancient Egyptian records.  "Harkuf's narrative" sometime during 
the Sixth Dynasty, states that it took approx. 7-8 months to journey 
to Yam and back to Egypt.  While no doubt along the voyage route 
to Punt-Punjab, Yemen long rich in the spice trade less the 
boomerang's and pigmy, would be a prime suspect for for Yam.  
But then, even with a caravan load of spices and animals, and just a 
jump across the mouth of the Red Sea by boat, 7-8 months seems 
a bit long.   

Last but not least, the Host's of Mara which was the army mentioned 
in connection with the attack on the Buddha, just happens to be what 
the Ancient Egyptians called Egypt itself.  The name Merah or more 
correctly, Ta-Mera is the ancient word for Egypt... no kidding.  So 
when Moses was leading the Israelites up out of Egypt, one of the first 
places that they were supposed to have stopped was the location of 
the 'bitter waters of Marah'.  Wow! Wow! Wow!  Futhermore, the Hyksos 
are really the Kassites... Absolutely!   The Ancient Egyptian word for 
Kassite is Hikau-Khoswet... heh, heh.  The Kassite gods are Shimalaya 
and Shuqammuna-Shakamuni... Really!  Please note, the 
Mesopotamian city of Mari... I wonder if their connected.  

The reason that I am writing this is that, throughout history, all of 
the items that I have discovered have been highly sought as curtural 
information.  Every single piece of information in the body of this 
material is considered the HOLY GRAIL of HISTORY!  Each of these 
discoveries as been hidden from the minds of humanity since long 
before the birth of Christ.  If your going to do a literary work or movie 
about anything, it should be as accurate as possible, and if one does 
not know of the existence of certain pieces of information then any 
documentary or feature film will be inaccurate.  I will do a movie about 
these discoveries.  Please note:  Hyksos-Kassites in the body of the 
work below.  Until now no one has been able to correctly identify the 
Hyksos invaders of Egypt... nobody.  Except myself, really...  The 
Hyksos-Kassites were originally Buddhist-Ammorites from the 
Himalayan Mountain regions related to Tibet and Northern India long 
after Ptah-Buddha-Moses died.   If this is true, then it is true impirically, 
that is aside from any authority or intellectual body.  However, if any 
material or body of research is not recognized or at least investigated 
by an independent or collective body of individuals... what's the point.  
If no one knows where to look, then one may not begin to find it.  Anyone, 
from any walk of life, can discover anything at all, all they have to do is 
look!  I know that you will find this material very interesting.  

Signed, 
Brian McMillan

Copyright 1994-2006, Brian S. McMillan   

Next:  Egyptian, Cambodian and Buddhist Influences in Olmec and Mayan Art   
by Brian S. McMillan 

P.S. There is a Mayan ceramic bust picturing Queen Tiy's head, Hat and all!  Wow.   

Overview of Thutmosis III Tomb art   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KV34 

The 'Eyes of Ptah-Buddha-Moses'   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Egypt.KV34.07.jpg 

Manjush-Re Chariot-Stupa, with 
The 'Eyes of Ptah-Buddha-Moses'   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Swayambhunath_stupa.jpg 

Pyramid blocks on barges   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Egypt.KV34.05.jpg 

Aaron as Anubis (Seth)? with his staff taming the snakes (controlling water).   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Egypt.KV34.06.jpg 

Also:   
http://www.godkings.com/godkingstourimages.html 
http://www.godkings.com/biblekings.txt 
http://www.godkings.com/mainpage.html 
http://www.godkings.com/info.txt 
http://www.godkings.com/ 
http://www.godkings.com/ufo.jpg 


Narmer-Ephraim Edit+Yashodharapura Edit-Jerusalem I, II, III, IV. 
Joseph-Horus Edit+Egypt and the Ancient Middle East+ Ephraim, 
Scorpion Zodiac edit + Forbidden City and Angkor Wat Design, 
by Brian S. McMillan  


Jerusalem I, II, III, IV.  
by Brian S. McMillan


Over the centuries, the kings of Judah and Israel 
were not necessarily born within the exact 
geographical boundaries of the primary kingdoms 
themselves.  And apparently some kings came to 
power from the frontiers of bodering territories.  
Extending suzerainty through the self appointed 
military might of whomever the 'Divine Lord' chose 
to rule them.  

The Book of Jeremiah, 36:20-23 in the Old Testament 
of the Holy Scriptures; describes the securing of the 
"scrolls" from the chamber of "E-Lish-ama" the 
secretary, also mentioned in the Ch'in commentary as 
the former Zhouish historical "Classic of Documents" 
and the "Classic of Songs" -the later equal to the 
Psalms of David or Songs of Solomon- destroyed in 
the "Burning of the Books" instituted by the 
statesman "Li Ssu" and described in the Holy 
Scriptures as ordered by King Jhihuangchin's 
predecessor King Jehoiakim, as he sat in the 
"Winter Palace".  

Since Angkor Wat is really the King Solomon Temple, 
then this would make Kamboja ancient Judah.  
And the ground plan for the Forbidden City's sacred 
architecture in Bejing China being based upon that 
of the Angkor Wat design would be no mere 
coincidence.  

Because of what I have discovered... the assignment 
for the ancient locations of Jerusalem have been 
detailed as follows, with the scope of Israel and 
Judah changing only in relation to the amount of 
territory held by those kingdoms.  All include the 
designation of Tibet, China and Southeast Asia as 
Canaan.  

Jerusalem I.  Sikkim-Shechem, 
Osiris-Israel-Lasha-Lhasa-Rasa-Asar
in scope including Lhasa as capital or ancient
location for Jebus possibly related to 
Beijing-Jebus.  

Jerusalem II. Judah-Camboja, Simeon-Siam, 
Yashodharapura, and oddly enough the names 
for Joshua-Shiva-Hoshea-Houchi may have a 
relationship to Yashodharapura and therefore, 
the name of Yashovarman... 
including Angkor Wat-Angkor Thom, as capitol 
and Angkor Wat-Solomon Temple built upon 
a representation of Mount Moriah-Meru.  

Jerusalem III.  Pekah-Peking, 
Beijing II China-Canaan, 
including Bejing as capital and the last ruling city 
of King Jehoiach'in-Shi-huangti-ch'in before the 
final exile.  This is why this location is referred to
as the "Forbidden City".  

Jerusalem IV.  Modern Israel, post-exile.  


SHABTI, EGYPTIAN   
NEW THEORY by   
Brian S. McMillan   


From "The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible, 
Edited by Henry Snyder Gehman", p. 351, quoting:   
"Bronze statue of Baal, the chief fertility god of 
the Canaanites."  This description is listed under a 
photograph of a bronze statue as part of a collection 
of objects in the "National Museum of Aleppo, 
Directeur General des Antiquites" Syria.   

Close examination of the bronze statue attributed to 
Baal from the source quoted above, reveals that the 
pose, dress and the crown of upper Egypt... even the 
style, are all identical to the Pre-Dynastic figure 
of King Narmer shown on the famous 
"Narmer Palette", circa 3000 BC.   

A side note is that I have found visual and artistic 
comparison between the Narmer Palette and the 
Scorpion Mace Head that would indicate that the 
personage represented on both were engraved by the 
same artist, which would dramatically increase the 
chances of both king's being the same person.   
Furthermore, I have found linguistic, artifact and 
genealogical comparisons indicating that Narmer and 
Scorpion are really the Zodiac Names for King Menes, 
who is really Manasseh, the son of the Biblical 
Joseph, and that Joseph is really Hor-Aha the Horus, 
the Son of Osiris-Israel of the Godkings of Ancient 
Egypt.  

Since writing the above work, I went back to the 
"New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible" and 
took a closer look at another so called statue of
"Baal"... What I have found is that the other Baal 
statue shown on page 82, listed as  a bronze 
originating from "Ras Shamra (ancient Ugarit)", 
and currently at the University Museum, 
University of Pennsylvania, has the horns and 
ears of a "Bull", which are the symbols associated 
with King Narmer.  Since there may be only one 
"Shabti" per king and this reduces the chance of 
"Scorpion" and "Narmer" being the same person.  
Which leaves Narmer as Menes and the best 
candidates for being Manasseh.  Although the 
symbology for bulls is also used in the Holy 
Scriptures in refering to Ephraim.... of which the 
name for Ephraim in ancient Hebrew is actually 
pronounced "parah", which means "to be fruitfull" 
and according to the "New Westminster 
Dictionary of the Bible" p. 273,  "The name is a 
play on the old name of the fruitfull mountain 
region where the larger tribe of Joseph lived".  
And oddly enough the word "parah" could be 
the basis for the formal name Pharoah.  So it 
would appear that King Hor-Aha as 
Joseph-Horus is the father of most, if not all of 
the Horus Kings of the First Dynasty of Egypt.  

So who was the king with the Zodiac name of 
Scorpion?... of which Shabti or the so called 
"Statue of Baal" is shown on page 351 of 
"The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible".  
And which Egyptian king was Ephraim?  Since, 
Manasseh was older than Ephraim, even 
though Ephraim received the greater blessing 
from Jacob-Osiris-Israel... This would mean 
that King Menes-Manasseh would probably 
have reigned before Ephraim.  
_____________________________________________  

I have finally pinned it down.  Since the above 
hypothesis for Ephraim as Narmer being my 
second choice, I have now moved that choice to 
the first and final position.  I don't usually 
use the internet to aid in the finalization of a 
historical discovery, however, we don't choose 
discoveries, discoveries choose us... and it 
was precisely because of the use of the word 
"parah" (which I found in the "The New Westminster 
Dictionary of the Bible"), as a name for Pharaoh 
that leads me to this announcement.  In retrospect, 
I should have immediately seized upon this 
comparison alone for my choice.  But alas, I was 
not yet convinced... so I took a closer look.  
And this is what I found:  

I was browsing the internet with a few moments to 
spare before Starbucks closed.  
I typed in the name Narmer on Google and 
Wikipedia came up as one of the choices.  Quoting:  

"Narmer (Ancient Egyptian Na3imu "Striker")"  

I wondered if the name "Na3imu" is related to the 
biblical name "Naaman" or "Naamah".  This led me 
to: http://www.BibleGateway.com 
New American Standard Version; "NAAMAN"  

Quoting: "1. Son of Benjamin (Genesis 46:21)"...  

Wow!  Were in in the right historical period for 
the Bennin and Oni of Ife, priest of On.  But not 
there yet.  So I went to: "NAARAI" on BibleGateway, 
Quoting:  

"1. One of David's heroes (1 Chronicles 11:37)"  
"2. Also called PAARAI"  

BINGO, WOW! WOW! WOW!... "PARRAI" for "NAARAI".  
NEXT: "NAARAN"  

Quoting:  

"1. A city in the eastern limits of Ephraim 
(1 Chronicles 7:28)"  

QUADRUPLE WOW!!!!... look more.  "NAARATH".  

Quoting:  

"1. A city on the southern boundary of the tribe 
of Ephraim (Joshua 16:7)  

Compelling for Narmer as Ephraim...  Thus: the 
Zodiac name for Asar-Osiris-Israel-Sirius... or 
Dog Star, "The one who sits on his mountain", the 
Jackal God.  

Thus, the crossing of the arms of Osiris as Israel 
or Jacob (McMillan 1997) during his blessings for 
his grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh is now given new 
clarity with regard to the GODKINGS of Ancient 
Egypt.   

Even though I am using later date nomenclature 
for making these comparisons.  It is precisely in 
this historical context by which Hebrew family 
tradition is established... or any family tradition 
for that matter.  

BibleGateway.com, (Genesis 48:13-15)  

Quoting:  

"13 Joseph took them both, Ephraim with his right 
hand toward Israel's left, and Manasseh with his 
left hand toward Israel's right, and brought them 
close to him."  

"14 But Israel stretched out his right hand and 
laid it on the head of Ephraim, who was the 
younger, and his left hand on Manasseh's head, 
crossing his hands, although Manasseh was the 
firstborn."  

Except quotes:  
Copyright 1997, Copyright 2006, Brian S. McMillan 
"LUCKY MAN"  
_____________________________________________  


Furthermore, it would appear that "Pot-pherah 
priest of On", also contains the term "parah" 
at the end of his name.  

Since the Egyptian site at Abydos, is the location 
given for the "entourage of Horus" or 
"Shemsuher";  that is the family decended from 
Shem the son of Noah or the "Shemitic", 
"Semitic" family of Jacob of the Old Testament 
of the Holy Scriptures.  And Joseph was given 
the falcon god name of "Horus"; probably the 
first usage of this title for a king.  And since the 
symbols for his royal name as recovered on a 
fragment show an early style "Ankh", which is 
actually a 'spoon' being inserted into the side 
of a "Stupa" shape, which looks suspiciously 
like the shape of a "granary", which would be 
Joseph's greatest historical legacy as attested 
to in the Book of Genesis.  Genesis 41: 56  
"And the famine was over all the face of the 
earth; and Joseph opened all the store-houses, 
and sold to the Egyptians; and the famine 
became severe in the land of Egypt."  

From The 
"ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ANCIENT EGYPT"  
"REVISED EDITION" by Margaret R. Bunson  
pg. 373, Quoting:  

"Shunet el-Zabib  A double walled FORTRESS 
called "the Storehouse of Dates" and located 
on the northern boundary of ABYDOS at Umm 
el-Ga'ab, this necropolis area dates to the 
Early Dynastic Period (2920-2575 B.C.E.)"  

Which is exactly the same date assigned to 
the period of rule or reign of "Hor-Aha", whom 
I have found is the legendary Joseph of the 
Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures.  And 
listed on pg. 14 of the "ENCYCLOPEDIA OF 
ANCIENT EGYPT" as "First ruler of the First 
Dynasty (r. 2920-2575 B.C.E.)".  So it would 
seem that grain was not the only commodity 
that was stored during the "famine", it would 
appear that "dates" were also kept as stored 
food stuffs.  

Another bronze "Baal" statue from a different 
source... not quoted above, reveals just as striking 
of a similarity to Rameses III of Egypt as 
represented on the south wall of the first pylon at 
Medinet Habu in Thebes.  Since it is already known 
that one of the previous kings... King Rameses II 
waged a military campaign against the Hittites 
during the 12th century BC, and since the bronze 
statue of the so called "Baal" appears to be of 
Egyptian New Kingdom style manufacture in the 
type of statue known as the "Shabti"... which are 
currently recognized to be used exclusively as 
funerary objects which accompany the royal 
personage into the afterlife.  What would the 
Hittites be doing with a shabti of Rameses in their 
possession?   

It has been stated from various sources that King 
Hor-Aha established trade with the Hittites as early 
as 3000 BC.  Again what would the Hittites be doing 
with a shabti of King Menes (Scorpion-Narmer) in 
their possession?   

During one of the military campaigns of Rameses II, 
it is known that the Hittites pillaged the base camp 
of his troops before help arrived.   

What if... the "Shabti" that we currently recognize 
as strictly a funerary object, was actually a 
"Talisman" used by the royal personage or pharaoh 
during the course of hunting or war etc., on a daily 
bases while they were still alive.  In this case to 
be used by Rameses personally or by his troops as 
they went into battle with the "Soul" of the 
"Godking" at their side.   

If the bronze "Baal" statues really represent the two 
Ancient Egyptian Kings that I have listed above.   
That would make the age of these statues more than 
1500 years different from one another.  Which would 
also mean that the war between Egypt and Hattusa, 
that is the Hittite Empire, would have been going on 
for more than  1500 years.   



"Cultural Influences From Early Summerian Egypt" by 
Brian S. McMillan. 

A book called "Ancient Iraq: 
(Assyria and Babylonia)", by P.R.S. Moorey and 
published by Oxford-Ashmolean 1976. 

P. 14 contains a photograph of Northern Mesopotamian 
pottery fragments which are from "Arpachiya" near the 
Upper Tigris River and tentatively dated to the sixth 
millennium B.C..  This date is based upon a 
compairson with a style of pottery found at Tell
Halaf, in the Northwest of the Upper Euphrates.  And 
the date for the Tell Halaf style pottery was 
established, based upon the same style discovered 
below the late "Ubaid" period of 4300 B.C. at 
"Tell al-Ubaid" Eridu and also at Ur. 

The shard in the center of the picture, center row, 
illustrates the existence of the hieroglyphic "ankh"; 
known to be exclusive in origin with Egyptian 
language.  Because the use of hieroglyphs in Egypt 
are recognized to emerge at about the end of the 
fourth millennium B.C.  This brings into question, 
not only the date, but also the cultural influence 
assigned to the location for the Tell Hallaf style 
pottery fragments of Northern Mesopotamia.   

Furthermore, since the pottery fragment design, 
appears to contain a linear "pattern" of the Egyptian 
"Ankh" in a later period  simplified style.  And the 
ankh, represented in this way, is known to be 
associated with flowing water... the sustainer of 
life.  I have tentatively identified the fragment as 
part of a drinking vessel. And since the fragment 
was found so far north on the Upper-Tigris, it 
had almost no chance of being re-deposited by 
flood waters and almost certainly arrived their 
through trade or occupational manufacture.  I say 
this because fired ceramics were usually 
considered worthless next to gold, livestock or 
slaves aquired through spoils of war.  But the 
later is not completely ruled out. 

Since the ankhs painted upon the Tell- Halaf pottery 
fragments are in a later Middle or New Kingdom, 
cursive egyptian style.  This would have to mean that 
these younger Tell-Halaf ruins were washed down river 
and deposited upon the older settlements at Eridu 
and then more ancient ruins associated with 
Tell-al-Ubaid were then redeposited upon these.   


Copyright 1995, Copyright 2001, Brian S. McMillan 
"LUCKY MAN"   

Visit: http://www.godkings.com/mainpage.html 
Visit: http://www.godkings.com/info.txt